Join the Community

22,218
Expert opinions
44,331
Total members
438
New members (last 30 days)
221
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,738
Total comments

Rating Agencies Stampeding Cattle

  0 1 comment

Since the first signs of the Credit Crunch and the debacle of bad asset valuation in the subprime disaster, the role of Credit Rating Agencies has created deep concern for Governments and Regulators alike. The independence that the finance industry always expected of ratings was almost unquestioned before, but not since.  This begs the question how do we rate the credit rating agencies?

The mistakes found during the credit crisis of 2007/8 are well documented but I am more interested in the position of Credit Rating Agencies today, which appear to be as strong as ever.

We only need to refer back a few days to the huge mistake of downgrading France and the disruption that caused the markets. Especially as confidence and trust in the markets are at such a low ebb and like sleeping cattle they are likely to stamped with minimal noise. Luckily the mistake was rectified quickly but it does illustrate how much power still resides with the Rating Agencies and their announcements.

Soon companies in the credit rating business will be regulated and not before time, but will this go far enough to prevent the trouble caused over the last 5 years?

Certainly transparency of the rating process and a public audit should allay fears concerning the actual independence that Rating Agencies purport to have. Remember they are not a charity and earn huge sums from those that are being rated and their products. The plan to move accounts regularly between rating firms would help to prevent long term relationships building to the detriment of the market. However, this will not be a solid wall to prevent abuse 100%.

The likelihood of new entrants into the ratings business looks unlikely unless a situation is artificially created to encourage firms into this market. There are potential prospects but they would need some assurance before committing.

The odds are, we have what we have and it will stay that way. The new regulations will of course be a costly exercise but should be weighed against the cost to the Markets, Governments and the tax payer, when things go wrong.

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

22,218
Expert opinions
44,331
Total members
438
New members (last 30 days)
221
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,738
Total comments

Now Hiring