Erica Andersen

Join the Community

22,646

Expert opinions

44,342

Total members

511

New members (last 30 days)

223

New opinions (last 30 days)

28,898

Total comments

Join Sign in

Marketing

smartR AI

Member since

08 Jul 2024

Location

Edinburgh

Experience

Marketing

smartR AI

To Present

Show all experience

Latest opinions

Beyond the Hype: Unleashing the Power of Private, Affordable, Assistive AI for a Better Future

AI. Its a word that evokes both excitement and apprehension. While some companies race to capitalize on the hype, many rightly remain hesitant, deterred by the known LLM negatives, any real need or required use case and therefore the perceived complexity and cost of implementation. But what if there was a different path? A way to harness the tran

26 February 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services

LLM Datacentre Mania - The Case for Specialized, Edge-Based SLMs

The 500bn US plans and the 200bn European counter to the Magnificent seven Salvo. Yes the world is abuzz with talk of what is effectively massive datacentres, the engines powering the Big business friendly LLM based version of the alleged Gen AI revolution. These colossal facilities, packed with cutting-edge hardware are the backbone of large lan

23 February 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services

Rethinking AI: From Artificial to Assistive Intelligence

© copyright smartR AI 2025 Recently, while preparing for a talk about trust in AI, I had an epiphany. As I explored various use cases—some successful, others not so much—I realized we've been thinking about AI all wrong. The "artificial" in Artificial Intelligence has always felt a bit off, hasn't it? What if we thought of AI instead as

16 February 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services

See all 36 opinions by Erica

Latest comments

ESG vs Generative AI: A Growing Dilemma in Corporate Ecosystems

When you read the latest on AI's hunger for power, then you know you need to choose your AI solution wisely if you want to maintain your ESG and Green profile.

Are you looking for "Wee, Green, Loyal and Lean!"?

SCOTi's small footprint means less energy consumption and a smaller carbon footprint. Small but perfectly formed there is rarely a need for server upgrades, which makes SCOTi® AI the greenest GPT around.
That's right, no on costs, no server upgrades, just a loyal, lean green machine that works for people and the planet.

Try SCOTi AI today and discover the power of private, secure, and compliant data management! Happy to do a show and tell if you have a spare 30 mins neil.gh@smartr.ai

25 Sep 2024 09:06 Read comment

The software ownership dilemma

Thank you for your informed opinon. It's always good to hear back from others in the community with AI insights.

22 Aug 2024 10:26 Read comment

The software ownership dilemma

Thank you, Ketharaman, for your insightful comment. Your perspective, rooted in decades of enterprise software sales experience, is invaluable.

I agree with your assessment of how COTS and SaaS vendors have historically maintained ownership of their software, including customer-specific data and customizations. Your point about vendors merging these customizations into future versions is astute and often overlooked.

Regarding GenAI, I concur that the initial models contain vast amounts of vendor-supplied training data. However, I believe the situation becomes more complex when we consider model specialization using proprietary company data.

Unlike traditional SaaS products, fine-tuning an AI model with company-specific data fundamentally alters the model itself. The weights of the neural network are adjusted, effectively embedding aspects of the proprietary data into the model's structure. This creates a unique challenge: the data becomes inseparable from the "software" (i.e., the model).

This inseparability is where I foresee potential issues. If a vendor were to use this specialized model for another client, they would inadvertently be transferring knowledge derived from one customer's proprietary data to another. This scenario is fundamentally different from traditional software customizations, where features can be more easily isolated and repurposed.

That said, I appreciate your prediction that GenAI vendors will find it easier to maintain total ownership. It's certainly possible that they will develop novel strategies to navigate these complexities.

Perhaps the solution lies in developing more sophisticated methods of model specialization that can clearly delineate between base knowledge and customer-specific insights. This could allow vendors to maintain control while ensuring customer data privacy.

I'm curious about your thoughts on potential solutions to this dilemma. How do you envision GenAI vendors balancing ownership rights with the need to protect customer-specific knowledge?

15 Aug 2024 08:51 Read comment