Community
A key driver for central counterparty (CCP) interoperability is greater competition in clearing, to bring down costs for customers. In what is an already aggressive European market, all interoperable CCPs have announced fee reductions.
However, customers should not select a CCP solely based on cost. With additional financial instruments being transferred to clearing houses, CCPs are increasingly viewed as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs). There has been much debate over whether CCPs are ‘too big to fail’ and just what would happen if a CCP were to default. With this in mind, other factors should influence a trading firm’s choice of clearing partner.
In particular, the capital strength of a CCP, the sustainability of its business model and the sophistication of its risk model are factors that are becoming increasingly important to customers, against the backdrop of a highly volatile market. At the same time, CCPs are having to differentiate themselves both in terms of market coverage and their range of services. Clients are looking for clearing houses that don’t limit themselves by servicing one financial market or one asset class. As a result, we can expect to see the forward-thinking CCPs moving outside of their traditional remits over the coming months in order to survive in this evolving market.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Jelle Van Schaick Head of Marketing at Intergiro
07 October
Kuldeep Shrimali Consulting Partner at Tata Consultancy Services
Nikunj Gundaniya Product manager at Digipay.guru
Ritesh Jain Founder at Infynit / Former COO HSBC
04 October
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.