Community
Selecting the right compliance solution is no longer just about ticking regulatory boxes. It’s about future-proofing your organization against the rising tide of risks and inefficiencies. One of the biggest threats hiding in plain sight? Technical debt—and it might already be costing your business more than you realize.
According to a 2022 report, the Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ) cost of poor software quality in the US has ballooned to at least $2.41 trillion. A large part of this comes from technical debt.
Technical debt is the buildup of outdated or poorly implemented technology that requires constant patching, reworking, or replacement. This debt isn’t always self-inflicted for compliance teams — it’s often inherited from your provider. Vendors that grow their platforms by acquiring other systems and cobbling them together are some of the biggest culprits. If your compliance solution relies on outdated systems or mismatched technologies that don’t integrate seamlessly, your business is likely paying the price in inefficiencies, risks, and missed opportunities.
In this article, we’ll explore how technical debt impacts your business, why pure play SaaS is the key to staying competitive, and how to recognize when it’s time to switch.
Industries operating under the watchful eye of regulators like the SEC, FINRA, and the FCA must be especially vigilant about technical debt. Outdated or poorly integrated systems can leave your compliance solution vulnerable to failure right when you need it most. This creates the perfect storm for missed compliance issues, hefty fines, and lasting reputational damage. Here’s how technical debt can undermine your compliance efforts:
Outdated systems struggle to keep up with rapidly changing regulations. Legacy infrastructure can make it harder to maintain compliance with new rules, leaving businesses vulnerable to penalties. According to the Ponemon Institute, the average cost of non-compliance is a staggering $14.82 million—compared to $5.47 million for compliance.
Operating on outdated systems is like juggling with lit torches—it might look manageable at first, but disaster is just a matter of time. The risks of legal action and reputational damage aren’t hypothetical—they’re inevitable. Can your business afford to keep playing with fire?
Patchwork solutions cobbled together to work around technical debt lead to inefficiencies. Manual interventions become the norm, increasing employee workload and downtime. The U.S. labor productivity cost of poor software quality is an eye-watering $2.08 trillion annually.
Simply put, technical debt means your business operates with one hand tied behind its back.
Technical debt limits your ability to scale and adapt to growing communication channels. As customers and employees increasingly rely on chat apps, video conferencing, and social media, businesses need agile systems that seamlessly integrate new platforms. Sticking with outdated solutions creates a bottleneck for growth.
When providers are bogged down by technical debt, they cannot deliver timely updates or new features. That leaves your business trailing competitors who have embraced forward-thinking solutions. Technical debt consumes up to 42% of a developer’s time—time that could otherwise be spent innovating.
Pure play SaaS (Software as a Service) is software built natively for the cloud, free of legacy systems or technical debt. This modern approach offers several clear advantages:
In regulated industries, the pace of change is accelerating. Providers burdened by technical debt can’t keep up, leaving businesses vulnerable. Hybrid solutions—often touted as the “best of both worlds”— usually fall short, shackled by outdated technology that hinders innovation. Ask yourself:
If you’re nodding along, it might be time to evaluate your current provider.
Technical debt isn’t just a problem for your provider—it’s a problem for your business. Ready to future-proof your compliance efforts? By choosing a pure-play SaaS provider, you can eliminate the risks of inherited technical debt and position your organization for long-term success.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Harish Maiya CEO at Orin
03 February
Hirander Misra Chairman and CEO at GMEX Group
Alex Kreger Founder & CEO at UXDA
Ritesh Jain Founder at Infynit / Former COO HSBC
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.