Community
A start-up’s journey can be a rocky one, made more complicated by the various rounds of external funding that are necessary for growth. Start-ups seek this funding from external investors to be able to fund their growth journey and it’s typically raised through a series of investment rounds from friends, family and business angels at the beginning, and venture capitalists (VC) and private equity (PE) firms in later stages. These rounds of funding become more onerous for the start-up as the invested capital increases.
Generally, the VC funding stage is considered pivotal, as it’s often the first major, professional round of funding, and indicates that a start-up shows true potential. Attracting interest from VCs and ultimately closing a funding round is a cause for celebration, however, this success also implies the start of a new chapter in the start-up’s growth journey. This chapter brings with it a whole raft of opportunities, but also higher expectations and the need for a step change in reporting on financials and KPIs. It’s therefore imperative the company's finance department is efficiently set up and prepared for scaling up.
This blog will discuss the expectations from start-ups pre- and post-funding and the vital role the finance department plays in the effective realisation of these objectives and in the overall growth of the company.
Pre-funding: the expectations for a start-up in the run-up to a funding round
For a VC to decide whether to invest in a start-up, they require a wealth of information, including, but not limited to:
It’s clear to see a significant amount of time and effort is needed to produce these reports and documents, which often require multiple iterations. The majority of the heavy lifting for these is done by the finance department, a function that is generally already understaffed and over-utilised. The finance department must therefore ensure it is prepared for these increases in demand by having (surge) capacity, skills and tools in place.
Post-funding: the ongoing expectations for a start-up after a funding round
A common and often underestimated consequence of obtaining a significant investment is that the company must now operate according to more stringent standards, across a variety of dimensions, for example after completing a VC funding round start-ups are often subject to a strictly enforced Shareholder Agreement. The Shareholder Agreement for professional investors is a lot more complex and difficult to navigate than a simple funding agreement usually used for friends, family and angel investors. The professional/institutional investor Shareholder Agreement contractually guarantees the investor certain rights such as delivery of financial information, inspection rights, rights of first refusal and observer rights. As part of the Shareholder Agreement, the start-up can be expected to provide the following financial information:
Whilst a start-up does not need a large finance department and a dedicated CFO during the pre-funding stages, the need for a scaled, connected finance team can quickly materialise after funding and once revenue is growing.
An underdeveloped and understaffed finance department could result in a start-up's inability to deliver the aforementioned requirements, thus potentially hindering future growth.
The challenges and possible solutions VCs see in scaling finance departments at start-ups
Following discussions with technology-focused VC firms, we discovered that an often-underdeveloped area of a start-up is its finance function. The lack of capability and capacity within the finance department usually comes to light during the pre-funding due diligence phase, which tends to result in delays in the production of accurate financial data, financial statements and schedules – both forward-facing and historical. This can significantly delay the investment process, and in some cases, lead to its termination.
A start-up’s finance department must therefore be prepared for growth. However, there are certain challenges to growing and expanding this critical function; these challenges relate to leadership, people, and technology. Finding a strong leadership figure (CFO or finance director) with relevant experience is burdensome. Additionally, hiring and retaining finance subject matter experts is difficult due to a limited pool of qualified talent and competitive packages offered by big brands. Lastly, start-ups often struggle to implement an effective IT architecture that enables automation and that can scale alongside the business due to time and budget restrictions.
In summary
To conclude, the aforementioned challenges can often be addressed by ensuring that an investment in the finance function (specifically in leadership, people and technology) is made early enough in the company’s journey. This investment should translate into the recruitment of the right profiles and the implementation of adequate and future-proofed systems, processes, and controls. Leveraging a managed service provider to reach these objectives can also enable a company to set up for success and prepare itself for the challenges that arise pre- and post-funding, with a relatively limited budget. Addressing these challenges will enable the function to set itself up for future success and will save significant costs and time in the long run.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Andrew Ducker Payments Consulting at Icon Solutions
19 December
Jamel Derdour CMO at Transact365 / Nucleus365
17 December
Andrii Shevchuk CTO & Co-Partner at Concryt
16 December
Alex Kreger Founder & CEO at UXDA
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.