Join the Community

22,039
Expert opinions
43,969
Total members
395
New members (last 30 days)
177
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,688
Total comments

Precision of Tech - Fine Margins of Error...

Boarding new merchants from a sales perspective is both an art and a science. The art of sales is a well-trodden field with numerous different approaches. We see it in every industry with experts imparting their advice on Youtube, reality television programmes and even in our everyday lives where we all try to employ our own techniques to get what we want. Personality driven for sure, but the art of sales is fundamentally a face-off between what you want out of the deal, and what your prospect actually needs. However, whilst the art is key to opening the door, it is the science that will ultimately deliver the results. The science or the “precision of tech” is the key to unlocking conversions, reducing fraud, and complying with the ever-changing rules and regulations surrounding the industry.

If you consider what needs to happen for a successful authorisation in payments, it’s an astonishing process, performed at lightning speed with so many components to it. Merchants, payment gateways, acquirers, card schemes and issuers all need to be in harmony for a payment to be successful. Delving deeper into that, the card issuer is being pressured to make decisions around a transaction at near real time, without delay. An issuer needs to know everything about the transaction in order to honour it. Is this really my customer? Has the customer inputted the card data correctly? What is my customer buying? Is the merchant they are spending money with legitimate and on an approved merchant category code? Does my customer have sufficient funds in his or her bank account? Is this an unusual transaction outside of the norm? Does the transaction value suggest something out of the ordinary? Has my customer performed a 3D secure validation of the transaction? Where is the merchant located? Why is my customer spending on a currency outside of GBP, when 99% of the transactions are in home currency? That’s a lot to work out in a fraction of a second and if any of these (and many more) factors are not fulfilled, then perhaps best not to honour the transaction? In a world of heightened compliance, it is easier for the bank to say no. Unless we don’t give them a reason to do so...

All of these considerations need to be looked at when a merchant integrates to a payment gateway, or a payment gateway integrates with an acquirer. This is where the science begins to kick in. If the issuer is placing these sorts of demands on the payment service provider and merchant, then we need to ensure that we send as much data as possible to improve the conversion rates. What we have seen on many occasions over the years is that the famous error response code 5 or “Do Not Honour” leads to a simple response from IT teams. “Please have the cardholder contact their issuer. We can’t help from here.” This always seems like an easy way out and a reason to investigate further on the precision of tech. As highlighted above, if the issuer isn’t happy with any part of the data they receive, they are likely not to honour the transaction. Should we look within ourselves therefore to understand if a portion of declines can be prevented, simply by investigating how the transaction(s) are being passed?

The goal in all of this remains the same. Discard unwanted transactions before they even get to the acquirer or issuer, only allow transactions within the acquirers permitted framework, keep fraud levels low and ensure the conversion rate remains as high as possible. If we think in reverse, without 3D Secure or fraud rules or even CVV checks, then conversions are going to be high. And so are the fraud levels. Conversely, by implementing 3D Secure, Countless fraud tools and extensive field requirements, conversions might well be much lower with ultra-low fraud levels. The science and the precision of tech is therefore a balancing act, allowing the right transactions to pass whilst capturing the problematic ones before they get anywhere near the issuer.

 

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

22,039
Expert opinions
43,969
Total members
395
New members (last 30 days)
177
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,688
Total comments

Trending

David Smith

David Smith Information Analyst at ManpowerGroup

Best 5 White-Label Neobank Solutions in 2024

Ruoyu Xie

Ruoyu Xie Marketing Manager at Grand Compliance

Governance, Risk and Compliance: How AI will Make Fintech Comply?

Now Hiring