Join the Community

24,143
Expert opinions
40,678
Total members
313
New members (last 30 days)
191
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,294
Total comments

More's Law is certainly true - affordable fraud?

Wouldn't it be better for the public's perception if a few hundred million pounds was spent eliminating most fraud, rather than spend vast sums without any effect?

I think it's about time to get real. I coined More's Law (=more fraud) earlier in the year and it's running stronger than Moore's law of computing power.

Whatever the industry is doing isn't working and it's time for a radical rethink.

I estimated it could be fixed for the whole UK for the token sum of £145 million per year back in June, but as you know costs are going up. It would probably still be possible for around £250 million.  What are the losses so far this year £320 million? Should run to at least double that by the end of Christmas.

What is there to lose? Trust - well you have plenty of that don't you? Hello Tesco!

And money - Probably looking at £640 million and the associated costs of investigations and new police units.

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

24,143
Expert opinions
40,678
Total members
313
New members (last 30 days)
191
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,294
Total comments

Trending

Mete Feridun

Mete Feridun Chair at EMU Centre for Financial Regulation and Risk

The Crypto Crash: A Stress Test for Global Financial Stability

John Reese

John Reese Business Analyst | Platform Growth Expert at Hashcodex

Perpetual Trading: The Entrepreneur’s Path to Consistent Market Wins

Alex Kreger

Alex Kreger Founder and CEO at UXDA Financial UX Design

From Inside-Out to Outside-In: Why UX Now Underpins Future Banking

Now Hiring