European Central Bank warns of Sepa failure in the absence of binding legislation

The European Central Bank has called on Brussels to impose concrete end-dates for the imposition of new payments instruments under the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa) project.

  0 4 comments

European Central Bank warns of Sepa failure in the absence of binding legislation

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

In December, the European Commission proposed an end-2012 timeline for the banking industry to move to new EU-wide credit transfers and direct debits.

The ECB - which had initially been calling for an end-2012 date for SCTs and a shift to SDDs taking place the following year - has reiterated its call for an extended timetable in its formal response to the European Commission's December paper.

Says the central bank: "Taking into consideration the payment industry's need for sufficiently long lead times, the ECB suggests setting concrete dates, which could preferably be at the end of January 2013 for credit transfers and the end of January 2014 for direct debits."

The ECB remains supportive of the European Commission's push for binding regulation, warning that a failure to act could wreck the entire project: "A Union act of general application, binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, is...considered essential for successful migration to Sepa, as the project would otherwise face a serious risk of failure."

The central bank is also calling on Brussels to provide clear guidance on the regulation of interchange fees for debit card transactions. In 2009, the Commission introduced a temporary default interchange fee for cross-border direct debits, together with a temporary endorsement of national interchange fees for direct debits.

"Both of these Articles will no longer apply on 1 November 2012," notes the ECB. "In order to avoid a legal vacuum hampering migration to Sepa direct debit, it is important that a long-term solution for interchange fees for direct debits is established."

Sponsored [Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming Mandates

Comments: (4)

Bo Harald

Bo Harald Chairman/Founding member, board member at Trust Infra for Real Time Economy Prgrm & MyData,

This gives time to integrate direct debit and e-invoicing - does not make any sense to run them separately.

Gary Wright

Gary Wright 

I will get more confident on any deadline date once i see Banks offering SEPA based services with a competative price structure and an authority that has significant sanctions for non compliance. Otherwise i want hold my breath

A Finextra member 

Banks are unlikely to develop effective products for consumers till there is more clarity on issues such as interchange from EU institutions.

Bo Harald

Bo Harald Chairman/Founding member, board member at Trust Infra for Real Time Economy Prgrm & MyData,

Argued for pan-EU e-invoicing (just-like-payment model) to be  launched first - then SEPA. Then 1.migration to SEPA would have happened in a natural way (payment of e-invoice leads to SEPA payment) and 2. direct debit would nicely have stepped into e-invoicing (not too late though).

Interchange on cost-covering level should not be a problem.

[Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming MandatesFinextra Promoted[Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming Mandates