Community
A few thoughts have occurred to me.
Financial services firms cutting off a publisher for 'alleged' crimes where no evidence of any crime by the publisher has been presented, let alone were they convicted of any offence.
Mastercard and Visa need to question the aptitude their management have for the modern world. Do they think this will end well for them? Lawsuit perhaps? I'd suggest the boards examine their options.
As for the reasons they have given for terminating 'service' for wikileaks, I am sad to say there have and are many instances where US Senators and even Presidents would have far better qualified for service termination. Customers may not be as stupid as you think they are.
Perhaps Mastercard or Visa could provide examples of where they have taken this action in the past?
I'm not a lawyer but if I was I sure would be lining up this one.
What happens when donations start to flow through say the hawalah system? Now that would be interesting.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Kyrylo Reitor Chief Marketing Officer at International Fintech Business
15 November
Francesco Fulcoli Chief Compliance and Risk Officer at Flagstone
Nkahiseng Ralepeli VP of Product: Digital Assets at Absa Bank, CIB.
14 November
Jamel Derdour CMO at Transact365 / Nucleus365
13 November
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.