Community
Know Your Customer (KYC) remains the cornerstone of identifying potential reputational and financial risks, but as information sources become increasingly diverse, traditional KYC verification methods might no longer be enough. Enter adverse media screening—the unsung hero of KYC that strengthens anti-money laundering (AML) defenses and helps businesses steer clear of high-risk relationships.
Adverse media screening: presenting a new angle on customer risk
Picture this. A new customer successfully passes routine KYC checks. Everything appears in order—identification verified, documentation intact, financial sources legitimate. Yet, underneath this façade lies a direct or indirect web of past financial or criminal misconduct only revealed in news articles. Adverse media screening steps in, systematically checking a vast array of public sources—news websites, regulatory databases, public records—to uncover negative information that traditional KYC checks are unlikely to capture. After all, customers are unlikely to self-report.
Examples of red flags include:
By identifying these warning signs early, businesses gain deeper insight into the actual risk profile of their customers, enabling them to make informed decisions. Adverse media screening also assists regulatory compliance with international sanctions regimes by detecting potential connections to sanctioned individuals or entities. In fact, both the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) are proponents of undertaking adverse media checks as an effective approach to managing risks.
The challenges of adverse media screening
While adverse media screening can be a powerful tool in avoiding risky business relationships, it’s not always easy. With the flood of information out there, the process can feel like finding the proverbial needle in a haystack. Moreover, customers are living organisms, and what might seem fine during initial checks can change as new information surfaces further down the line.
Language and regional differences present further obstacles. Since news is published globally in multiple languages and at varying frequencies, businesses without robust multilingual capabilities may miss crucial risk indicators.
Compounding these issues is the prevalence of false positives. Irrelevant mentions or misleading contextual references can trigger unnecessary alerts, consuming valuable time and diverting compliance teams from focusing on genuine threats.
Finally, organizations must constantly update screening processes to keep pace with evolving threats. This is particularly important given the current volatile geopolitical backdrop, but it’s not always a simple matter to keep up to speed.
Strengthening risk screening practices
Implementing a robust adverse media screening solution can help businesses overcome many of these challenges. It should integrate seamlessly with existing KYC processes and enhance due diligence by detailing information that clients themselves don’t provide for KYC verification, ensuring a more comprehensive customer profile.
As a result, businesses are in a better position to proactively identify risks, catching potential issues before they escalate into major problems. Beyond initial onboarding, continuous monitoring ensures that organizations stay updated on any changes in a customer's risk profile, helping them respond swiftly to emerging threats.
Additionally, as global regulators increasingly require more than just basic background checks, adverse media screening plays an integral role in ensuring compliance with standards. Perhaps most importantly, it helps safeguard a company’s reputation by allowing businesses to steer clear of partnerships that, while technically permissible, could still pose significant reputational risks.
Elevating KYC: a trust-driven approach
In today’s world, a strong KYC program must go beyond ticking compliance checkboxes to foster trust. By incorporating adverse media screening into AML and KYC frameworks, businesses can gain a strategic advantage in proactively identifying risks, enhancing due diligence, and safeguarding their institutions from financial crime. Ultimately, it’s about moving beyond pure AML compliance and protecting the integrity of the financial system.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Prakash Bhudia HOD – Product & Growth at Deriv
13 March
James Strudwick Executive Director at Starknet Foundation
Foday Joof Risk Management Officer at Central Bank of The Gambia
Anoop Melethil Head of Marketing at Maveric Systems
12 March
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.