Blog article
See all stories »

Why Digital Transformation at Banks Sucks Right Now (and How to Fix It)

The financial services industry is at a critical juncture. Despite staggering investments, banks are still struggling with digital transformation. But why? Let’s dive into the tangled web of challenges banks face, the failed promises of past solutions, and take a look at what I believe to be the path towards a brighter future.

The Harsh Reality

Imagine trying to overhaul a massive ship while it’s still sailing. That’s the reality banks face with digital transformation. With decades of technological investments, they are burdened with an intricate maze of legacy systems, technical debt, and an ever-growing pile of regulatory requirements. These aren’t just speed bumps; they’re massive roadblocks.

Despite pouring billions into IT—over $100 billion annually for the top 10 largest banks alone—the returns are disappointingly meager. When we scale this to the top 1000 banks, the costs balloon to nearly a trillion dollars. The issue isn’t a lack of talent but the overwhelming complexity and rigidity of existing systems.

False Dawn: The Mirage of Quick Fixes

Banks have relentlessly sought solutions. From adopting the latest technologies to integrating sophisticated tools, each promised to be the silver bullet. Yet, these solutions have often added to the complexity rather than alleviating it.

Technical Debt: Over time, banks have amassed significant technical debt. Each new technology intended to simplify processes has instead layered on more complexity, leading to fragmented and unstable tech stacks.

Regulatory Quagmire: The financial sector is one of the most heavily regulated industries. Navigating constantly evolving data protection, security, and privacy regulations is akin to trying to hit a moving target while blindfolded. The result? Substantial operational overhead and continuous adaptation.

Cybersecurity Nightmares: With sensitive data at stake, banks are prime targets for cyber threats. The need for advanced security measures and constant vigilance further complicates digital transformation efforts.

Legacy System Lock-in: Many banks still rely on outdated legacy systems, making integration with modern solutions a Herculean task. The fear of disrupting business continuity often stalls progress.

Risk-Averse Culture: Traditionally, banks are risk-averse. As they should be. Anybody would be if facing the regulation, scrutiny, and consequences that they face. This conservative approach, while ensuring stability, can stifle innovation and slow down the adoption of transformative technologies.

The Path Forward: A Hybrid Solution

So, what’s the way out of this quagmire? The answer lies in a hybrid approach that combines the agility of Low Code/No Code (LCNC) with the robustness of traditional coding languages, supercharged by the power of AI.

LCNC platforms offer a quick and efficient way to develop smaller, less complex applications. They enable rapid prototyping and deployment, making them perfect for tasks that require speed and agility. However, they fall short when it comes to building scalable, complex applications needed by large enterprises.

This is where AI steps in. By integrating AI with both no-code and full-code platforms, banks can achieve a revolutionary transformation. AI accelerates coding processes, handles complex data requirements, and ensures regulatory compliance with ease. This hybrid approach allows banks to leverage the best of both worlds: the simplicity and speed of LCNC for less complex tasks, and the robustness and flexibility of traditional coding for critical, large-scale applications.

A Brighter Future

Picture a future where banks are no longer bogged down by their own tech. A future where innovation isn’t stifled by complexity but is the driving force of daily operations. This is the vision we’re striving towards—a seamless blend of AI, LCNC, and traditional coding that empowers banks to innovate, adapt, and thrive.

Imagine swiftly bringing new platforms to market, adding features on the fly, and implementing regulatory changes in weeks instead of years. This isn’t a distant dream; it’s an achievable reality. By adopting this hybrid approach, banks can consolidate their existing technology systems into a unified data model, simplifying development and enabling the rapid deployment of robust, modern applications.

694

Comments: (0)

Ioan Iacob

Ioan Iacob

CEO

FlowX.AI

Member since

29 Jul

Location

New York

Blog posts

1

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Banking

Banks nowadays are in stiff competition for human resources with fintech. The financial technology sector often offers higher pay. Still, the prospects of many such start-ups are difficult to forecast – they are as likely to occupy a solid niche as they are to go bust. Stable companies in Latvia are only a handful. Primarily, fintech players active in Latvia are headquartered in foreign countries – the United Kingdom, to name one – despite maintaining offices in Riga and employing staff in Latvia


See all

Now hiring