Blog article
See all stories »

Is Open Banking all it claims to be?

Open banking is becoming more widespread. The UK’s OBIE (Open Banking Implementation Entity) reported that the number of open banking users doubled from January to September 2020. With the EU looking to introduce open banking in the coming years, some reports claim that open banking has ‘delivered on every count’.

But despite its impressive growth figures, there are still indications that the full benefits of open banking have yet to be realised. One of the main reasons for this stems from open banking’s general reliance on banks still using batch processing, which is preventing access to real-time payments.

Real-time payments systems coupled with the use of APIs are currently providing the instantaneous transactions that the modern customer expects in various services – just not universally in the banking industry yet and not for Open Banking transactions.

As such, the global and uniform integration of real-time payments systems can help bring about the full benefits of open banking.

What are the problems with open banking?

To better understand why open banking is not quite living up to its potential just yet, it’s important to look at the three areas that it was designed to solve.

Open banking was intended to be:

  • Ubiquitous -- but not everyone provides open banking yet and the UX differs depending on the provider
  • Available 24/7 -- but acquirers don’t have a real-time view of what is happening
  • Instantaneous -- but merchants have to wait for updates from acquirers.

Given how many businesses are now using open banking, the lack of value they extract from these processes could have significant knock-on effects. 

How many businesses are using open banking?

Since March 2020, 50% of those surveyed across the UK’s small business community confirmed they are using open banking service providers. 

With SMEs accounting for 99.9% of the business population, that’s a massive proportion of the economy that doesn’t see the full benefits of a service meant to revolutionise the payments industry. In turn that means that a substantial number of businesses are not extracting maximum value from open banking.

Is that really a case of ‘delivering on every count’ ? as claimed by Accenture’s 2019 report on open banking and real-time payments.

But some businesses do extract more value from open banking by taking advantage of B2B real-time payments systems.

A closer look at B2B real-time payments

Many bank transactions take place under batch processing or using off-line or batch notifications.

Batch processing is how multiple transactions are bundled up together and cleared all at once. The problem with batch processing is that it instils uncertainty into the system for everyone. You can’t know for sure whether your transaction will go through in 15 minutes, or a couple of hours, or a day.

Real-time payments, on the other hand, work by linking up the various systems that need to communicate with each other with plugged-in APIs. This takes the ‘delay’ time down to a matter of milliseconds.

But what does this look like in the real world of B2B transactions?

How B2B real-time payments systems work

Real-time payments systems enable merchants and acquirers to receive and release funds immediately.

In practical terms, this means that a corner shop owner (the merchant), having taken a payment on a card machine in their store (the transaction), can be offered the funds from the transaction instantly by their acquirer (Visa, Mastercard or PayPal). The same concept of instant payout from the acquirer should also be available with open banking but this is often not the case.

A better customer experience through real-time payments systems

So what are the main benefits for merchants and end customers where real-time payments, and by extension, fully realised open banking, are concerned?

  • Merchants have real-time access to cash and improved cash flows
  • End customers don’t get anxious, wondering where their money has gone.

 How does this compare to the current payments experience?

Why open banking currently isn’t working for merchants

For a start, open banking is difficult for merchants to access as they have to go through regulated entities or their merchant acquirers.

Of the regulated entities & acquirers that offer open banking as an alternative way to pay, a significant number aren’t set up for real-time payments, which as we’ve seen minimises the benefits of open banking.

As a consequence, experiences are rendered sub-optimal for almost all users and end-customers, in particular, who have no idea where their money is at any time. If these customers wanted to find out what was happening to their money, there’s a high probability that the companies processing their transactions wouldn’t be able to tell them. They’ve maybe had a confirmation that the transaction was processed, but because they (or their regulated partner) are not directly connected to Faster Payments, but where is the actual money and can the merchant see that cash in their account?

This experience is bad even for small transactions. For large transactions, this scenario can cause genuine panic, which often translates into long calls lodged with payment providers, draining internal resources as teams deal with avoidable complaints.

Until real-time payments systems are integrated globally across banks, merchants and acquirers, open banking can’t deliver on its promising ambitions. 

Open banking: The dangers of a great idea, poorly executed

With the faster payments limit poised to increase to £1m this year, now is the time for banks, PSPs and acquirers to revolutionise their customer experiences by passing on the benefits of real-time payments to merchants using their systems.

By leveraging real-time payments systems, open banking can deliver on its promises and provide its full benefits to the merchants, acquirers and the consumer.

 

5985

Comments: (4)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 26 April, 2021, 09:061 like 1 like

In your opening sentence you state that the number of open banking users doubled in the nine months to September 2020, but you do not give any numbers or percentages. Doubling a very low number is still a very low number. Perhaps you can give actual percentages.

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 26 April, 2021, 13:50Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

"Doubling" means "actual percentage" = 100%.

When I last heard, the actual nuimber of Open Banking users in UK (or EU?) was 3 million. 

FPS has been implemented by at least one UK bank that I know of which has a mainframe based customer accounting system running batch processes. I find it hard to believe that mainframe / batch processing prevents Real Time Payments.

For the last 5 years or so, I've been saying that the really compelling usage scenarios envisaged for Open Banking have been done in other countries - even within EU - without Open Banking regulation and, per contra, the other usage scenarios envisaged for OB are not so compelling, otherwise, they'd have been done without OB.

Four years ago, I commented here: "...the basic premise of Open Banking / PSD2 becomes somewhat questionable. Forget anti-climax, PSD2 offerings would be Dead on Arrival." 

Well, that's what seems to have happened.

Angelos Michalos
Angelos Michalos - PaymentComponents - Athens 28 April, 2021, 13:182 likes 2 likes

Open Banking is a mentality change for every banker and merchant.

Once they can understand the meaning of an ecosystem and the evolution that it brings to the digital financial services then they will reap the benefits from it. 

Well, there are always the forward-thinkers that realised quickly how impactful Open Banking is. We see everyday how they succesfully integrated Open Banking services to the core of their activities to accelerate and simplify many processes. 

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 28 April, 2021, 14:26Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

"Ahead of time", "customer needs education", "behavior change is required", "it's not a milestone but a journey".  

I'm not suggesting causation vis-a-vis Open Banking but it'd be terribly naive to miss the strong correlation between these expressions and the euphemisms used to rationalize flopshow products.

Now hiring