Community
It was always clear that Brexit was going to be an inherently complex undertaking that the industry must muddle through somehow. By now we’re all quite used to politicians of every stripe selling us their promises and claims, ranging from the more realistic to the less credible. What’s different this week is that the regulatory authorities have now waded in to the argument. As my colleague noted yesterday, the EBA claimed that banks’ plans for a hard Brexit were “inadequate”. Now the FCA has hit back, refuting that claim.
This is quite astonishing. Even with something as controversial as MiFID II, public disagreements between European regulators were limited. They usually managed to settle their differences behind closed doors before representing a joint position publicly. While an honest and open debate is always welcome, the benefits of regulators agreeing on a common set of requirements are undeniable. But judging by this week’s statements, it looks like the road through Brexit has a few more twists and turns to navigate before the authorities on both sides of the Channel can agree on a joint position.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Muhammad Qasim Senior Software Developer at PSPC
16 October
Naina Rajgopalan Content Head at Freo
Mete Feridun Chair at EMU Centre for Financial Regulation and Risk
15 October
Andrew Bonsall COO at AperiData
14 October
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.