Modern customers, modern payments: Addressing a changing e-commerce landscape

  1 2 comments

Modern customers, modern payments: Addressing a changing e-commerce landscape

Contributed

This content is contributed or sourced from third parties but has been subject to Finextra editorial review.

In 2025, retail e-commerce revenue is expected to exceed $4.8 billion worldwide. Over the last five years, the world has shifted to digital: online shopping from retailers across borders is overtaking high-street shopping, and in the world of payments, contactless and BNPL (buy now, pay later) are increasingly catching up to traditional card or cash payments.

Today, the modern customer has more choice than ever before, and that choice is shaping the world of e-commerce payments. Merchants and issuers alike need to adapt to this new, agile, cross-border world in order to capture the potential of the e-commerce growth we’re experiencing.

Finextra spoke to Moshe Winegarten, chief revenue officer at Ecommpay, to understand how consumer choice is shaping the payments landscape, and how merchants need to adapt in order to thrive in an e-commerce world without borders.

Spoilt for choice – optimising the checkout experience

One of the best ways to examine how consumer choice has shaped the market is by looking at checkout optimisation. Statista found that 69% of online shopping carts were abandoned in the UK in Q3 of 2024. Referring to Ecommpay’s own research, conducted during 2024 in association with IMRG, Winegarten states that once UK customers get to the checkout process, conversion still only reaches 58% on average.

“Our study found that, on average, checkout abandonment occurs at nearly 90% of the typical length of time it takes to complete a payment,” Winegarten explained. “When a customer has taken time to input their data and abandons the purchase at such a late stage, there is clearly a significant barrier that must be addressed.”

Some of the reasons for cart abandonment identified include:

  • Unexpected costs, such as high shipping fees or taxes appearing late in the checkout process.
  • A complex checkout process, including complicated forms, multiple steps, or forced account creation.
  • Limited or lack of suitable or familiar payment options.
  • Concerns about security.
  • Slow website speed and a sluggish checkout experience.
  • High shipping costs or long delivery times.
  • A change of mind or losing interest before finalising at checkout.

Checkout complexity is one of the main factors influencing drop-off. The research additionally found that 59% of orders come from guest customers, showcasing that many shoppers prefer not to register with a retailer when making a purchase.

Another crucial aspect is payment methods. “Credit and debit cards remain the most common payment method, but only account for half of all e-commerce revenue for the businesses surveyed. The other 50% of revenue is split across a range of alternative payment methods, including BNPL solutions and e-wallets,” Winegarten commented.

Seeing this equal split between traditional and alternative payment methods means that providing a range of payment options should be high on the list of priorities for e-commerce businesses looking to improve conversions. Another priority should be offering express checkouts.

Winegarten emphasised: “Breaking down conversions based on the number of express checkout options provided shows that the wider the range of options available, the greater the conversion rate. Merchants not offering express checkout report 52% conversions, which increase steadily with the addition of each express option, reaching 67% for those providing access to four express checkout options.”

Avoiding IBAN payments discrimination in a cross-border world

As more and more e-commerce happens across borders, facilitating streamlined payments becomes crucial to success. “Half of merchants who sell internationally provide localised payment options for customers based overseas, which could significantly impact cross-border conversions,” Winegarten explained. “Based on feedback from our clients, we know that a dynamic checkout that presents relevant payment methods for where the customer is located can improve conversion rates, while currency choice boosts conversion and approval.”

However, in Europe one concern remains: IBAN discrimination. In 2024, the European Commission’s Mairead McGuinness commented in a meeting of EU payment officials: “Nine years after the deadline for SEPA implementation, there are still companies and public administrations refusing to make or receive euro payments involving non-domestic accounts.”

In the case of open banking, it means that instant payments either cannot be initiated to a bank account from a different member state, or that banks create discriminatory, unnecessary steps which discourage the user and lead to high rates of abandoned or cancelled payments.

IBAN discrimination affects people across the EU on a daily basis. It also affects businesses, preventing companies from scaling across the EU, as they are unable to pay their suppliers or receive payments from their customers. “For merchants, the refusal of non-domestic IBANs can lead to lost sales and diminished customer trust,” Winegarten explained. “For payment providers, IBAN discrimination disrupts the promise of a unified payments market, creating unnecessary friction in payment journeys.”

Open banking enables businesses to streamline their payments offering, and open banking virtual accounts help minimise the risk of discrimination by settling to local IBANs.

Technical considerations for merchants

Open banking should be considered as a payment method integrated within the full payment stack. Winegarten emphasised that open banking providers should consider their business model carefully, because “the economics for directly selling open banking as a standalone payment solution are very challenging. The vast majority of merchants will offer open banking payments via their main PSP.”

Yet onboarding, integrating, and managing every payment method and currency in-house comes with complex technical considerations and is unsustainable for many merchants. Working with PSPs can help alleviate those pressures because it allows businesses to add and offer a wider range of payment and express checkout options without increasing resource requirements or website complexity.

“If one provider can deliver a range of solutions via a single integration, it removes the need for a multitude of partnerships,” Winegarten outlined. “Open banking, subscriptions, payment orchestration, global payments, express checkout, and alternative payment methods can all be offered via one partnership, one integration, one account to manage. This also provides the e-commerce business with the capability to scale globally with access to a huge range of payment methods, while also benefiting from increased authorisation rates and drastically decreased transaction costs.”

Yet Winegarten also warned against the assumption that one payment platform for all customer transactions – physical and digital (omnichannel) – is the holy grail for every merchant. “Being able to serve customers seamlessly across all channels and providing a wide range of payment options remains essential. Using one provider to deliver multiple payment types across every one of these channels may not be in the best interests of the merchant or their customers.”

For merchants, the priority must remain in providing the best service to their customers, which means they must be able to identify customers across channels. Many payment providers began life as a single-channel provider, meaning that solutions have been tacked on as and when customer demand required it, leaving many elements of their offering very basic.

“Many merchants believe that using a single payment provider is the only way to achieve seamless payments and a good customer journey,” Winegarten summarised. “However, this approach leaves customers at a disadvantage, having to deal with rudimentary payment solutions.”

What can we expect from e-commerce payments in 2025?

In 2024, we’ve seen a lot of traction gained by open banking, BNPL, and marketplaces. “Open banking is still growing despite challenges with pricing and a push for profitability,” Winegarten summarised. “And BNPL may have come into its own during Covid, but is now settling into a new space, including longer-term lending and responsible finance to ensure longevity. We are also seeing more merchants sell through marketplaces, and even the larger providers developing payment solutions specifically targeting currently underserved marketplaces.”

Enabled by innovations in tech, e-commerce payments are being simplified, streamlined, and secured better than ever before. This also allows more one-click payment options to emerge from both e-commerce platforms as well as PSPs. Exciting developments shaping the market can be seen by companies like Mastercard, confirming their commitment to tokenize card payments by 2027, which helps increase security, convenience, and – ultimately – conversion.

Lastly, we can expect a continued push towards cross-border in 2025. “Exciting things can be seen in the continued growth of globalisation, with merchants servicing beyond their borders. We are seeing more and more demand outside of Europe for UK merchants, particularly in the Middle East and most recently in Africa,” Winegarten concluded.

Channels

Keywords

Comments: (2)

A Finextra member 

Obviously merchants want to conclude the sale by getting the payment and choice of payment method for the e-comm customer is neccessary since customers from multiple markets are used to use their differing dominant payment method. Merchants also need an orderly back-office and reconciliation process which becomes more complex with multiple payments methods offered. Instant payments have the challenge that each customer payment is deposited to the merchant corporate current account which makes reconsiliation of account receivables more complex than dealing with a card acquirer who pays out a daily gross settlement each banking day  for all reported sales and invoices the MSC once per month. Also the exeception management of instant payments is more complex than the well established processes in card payments. Consumer rights for charge-back  are more complex and limited in IP than in cards. BNPL is not really a payment at all but a credit to the consumer issued normally by a financial company who pays out to the merchant less some kind a discount and with its settlement processes which will vary from other settlement processes. BNPL therefore is also governed by the consumer credit legislation and may introduce new risks to the merchant. These are just a few examples of complexity added by multiple payment methods that create the need for a middle man service to stream-line the payment process back-end for the merchant. This will add on cost for the merchant. 

Graham Smith

Graham Smith Managing Director at Volopa Financial Services (Scotland) Limited

Although cross border payments themselves are becoming easier, smoother, better, more secure for the consumer to make purchases, I have one observation to add regarding this changing landscape. There is a challenge emerging when an unhappy path is experienced. Claiming and receiving a refund (which falls outside the chargeback process), is more difficult, or as I have found, impossible, when the merchant is in another part of the world with no UK presence. 

Recource through the company's management structure can be non-existent and there is no cross-border/global equivalent of the UK's distance selling regulations or consumer ombudsman to turn to, coupled with no obvious concern of reputational risk from the merchant, given my (and numerous others) Trust Pilot summary.

I my real life example, after 18 months there is still no sign of a refund despite continued efforts, even though the merchant's support team recognise and acknowledge my claim and tell me the process to refund is "taking its time!"

A global, cross border, intergalactic greater authority aimed at consumer protection may be justifiable at some point going forward and would be useful, or a registration/certification mechanism to help protect against untrustworthy online merchants operating anywhere around the globe. 

Probably, too costly to implement and too big an ask today therefore, we are pretty much left with Trust Pilot and its limitations, to assess the risk associated with purchasing from any non-domestic merchant in this ever changing e-commerce landscape.

Sponsored

This content has been created by the Finextra editorial team with inputs from subject matter experts at the funding sponsor.