/retail banking

News and resources on retail banking, consumer finance and reinventing customer experience in finance.

UK to raise deposit protection limit to £110,000

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing to raise the deposit protection limit of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) from £85,000 to £110,000.

  1 1 comment

UK to raise deposit protection limit to £110,000

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The deposit protection limit - which represents the maximum amount of money the FSCS typically protects should a depositor’s bank, building society or credit union become insolvent - has been set at £85,000 since 2017.

The proposed increase takes into account inflation since the limit was last changed. If taken forward, the new limit would apply to firms that fail from 1 December 2025.

Sam Woods, deputy governor for prudential regulation and CEO of the PRA says: “Confidence in our financial system is an essential foundation for economic growth. We want to support confidence in our banks, building societies and credit unions by raising the amount that people can keep in their account which is covered by the deposit guarantee scheme to £110,000 per person, so all that money is safe even if the firm fails.”

The FSCS, established in 2001, has paid compensation of £10.1 million to depositors in the past three full financial years, primarily in relation to small credit union failures. Since it was established, the FSCS has paid over £20 billion, primarily in relation to deposit failures during the 2008 financial crisis.

Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, comments: "Raising the deposit protection limit is a sensible decision to support consumer confidence in the financial service industry. At a time when the government and regulators are going for growth, this decision is a reminder that strong consumer protections and economic growth go hand in hand."

The proposal comes as part of a wide-ranging consultation on deposit protection provided by the FSCS. This also includes an increase in the limit applicable to certain temporary high balance claims - used for specific events like buying or selling a house and payouts from insurance policies - from £1 million to £1.4 million, with effect from 1 December 2025.

The PRA is also considering diverting funds provided through the FSCS scheme to recapitalise a failing bank to support its sale or transfer to a bridge bank.

Sponsored [New Industry Survey Report] US Regulation Survey 2025: Compliance at a Crossroads

Comments: (1)

A Finextra member 

Who keeps £85,000 in a bank account, let alone £110,000?  FSCS is designed to protect the wealthy at the expense of the rest of consumers.

The fact that FSCS has paid over £20 billion, primarily in relation to deposit failures during the 2008 financial crisis highlighst that it creates moral hazard for banks. They win when they profit from excessive lending and the tax payer loses if they go insolvent - I doubt FSCS has anything like the funds needed to refund protected consumers if even a medium size bank goes under. 

Compensating depositors from failed small credit unions makes it look like FSCS works and is beneficial, but would it work for a large bank that fails with say 10m customers and £100bn in protected deposits?  I doubt it, and it didn't during the GFC. It means even though the FSCS levy is based on the level of deposits, the credit union is paying a levy that reflects its risks and may even be overpaying, while the large bank isn't - it can be bailed out only by the taxpayer.

A better solution would be market driven insurance schemes which FIs can choose to use and pay market rates, and compete on how secure their deposits are.

[On-Demand Webinar] Transforming Wealth Management through Macroeconomic InsightsFinextra Promoted[On-Demand Webinar] Transforming Wealth Management through Macroeconomic Insights