/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

Neonomics files complaint over anti-competitive practices in Norway's payments market

Open banking data vendor Neonomics has filed a complaint with the Norwegian Competition Authority alleging anti-competitive practices in the payments market by the country's banking sector.

  0 2 comments

Neonomics files complaint over anti-competitive practices in Norway's payments market

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

Neonomics, which is authorized by the Norwegian FSA as a licensed payment institution, alleges that banks have actively worked to undermine the goals of the EU's Payment Service Directive PSD2 by deliberately limiting access to critical payment markets.

The complaint allleges that Norwegian banks have coordinated to block access to direct debit payments, effectively excluding new entrants from competing with the monopoly of the established AvtaleGiro product, delivered by Mastercard Merchant Services.

Neonomics further alleges that banks have applied unreasonable prices and terms for essential services, such as client accounts and delegated strong customer authentication (SCA), creating insurmountable barriers for third-party providers attempting to compete with bank-led solutions.

Neonomics additionally alleges that the banking sector's efforts to prevent fair competition extend to providing subsidies and preferential terms to established providers, such as Vipps, Visa, and Mastercard.

Christoffer Andvig, founder and CEO of Neonomics states: “The actions of the Norwegian banks not only undermine the core principles of PSD2 but also stifle competition, innovation, and choice in the payment services market. This behavior harms consumers and businesses alike, while protecting entrenched interests. We urge the competition authorities to act decisively to restore fair competition and ensure compliance with both EU and Norwegian regulations.”

He is calling on the Norwegian Competition Authority to conduct a thorough investigation and take necessary measures to ensure a level playing field.

Sponsored [Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming Mandates

Related Company

Keywords

Comments: (2)

Jeremy Light

Jeremy Light Co-founder at Fourdotzero

This will be interesting - I have always suspected that competition in retail payments in Norway must be limited, for example, Vipps charges as high as 2.99% + 1NOK for online payments there. In Denmark, using the same platform (owned by Vipps) the cost is 1.49% + 1DKK. Even that is high, in a truly competitive market the cost of any retail payment goes below 1%.

A Finextra member 

The NO payments market has looked like a monopoly for years and the acquiring market for the domestic debit card is another example. High processing fee payable by merchants to the co-owned debit card company while issuers of the cards who co-own the debit card co,  get a free ride . Good luck Neonomics, you will need is, since the competition office is unlikely to take action if the consequence would be to open up the market for foreign providers. 

[On-Demand Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming MandatesFinextra Promoted[On-Demand Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming Mandates