/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

UK MPs urge caution on creation of digital pound

UK parliamentarians on the cross-party Treasury Committee have urged to Bank of England to address data privacy and financial stability concerns before considering the implementation of a digital pound.

  2 3 comments

UK MPs urge caution on creation of digital pound

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The Committee expresses concerns about the new risks a retail CBDC could pose to financial stability, suggesting that the UK economy may be more susceptible to bank runs if people are able to switch large amounts of bank deposits into digital pounds quickly in times of market turmoil, increasing the risk of bank failures.

It also registered concerns regarding estimates that a steady switching of some bank deposits into retail digital pounds could increase the interest rates on bank loans by 0.8 percentage points or more.

To mitigate these risks, Committee members suggest a smaller limit on the value of retail digital pounds each individual is initially allowed to hold than the £10,000-£20,000 limit currently mooted by the Bank of England and Treasury in their consultation.

MPs have also urged the Government to alleviate privacy concerns around the misuse of personal data through robust regulation and legislated protections.

The Treasury Committee further notes that the next stage of work on a retail digital pound could incur significant costs and urges both the Bank of England and Treasury to be transparent about these costs through annual reporting.

Chair of the Treasury Committee, Harriett Baldwin, says: "It must be clearly evidenced that a retail digital pound will provide benefits to the UK economy without increasing risks or leading to unmanageable costs before any decision is taken to introduce it into our financial system.

"We must also keep a close eye on ensuring that any retail digital pound does not worsen financial exclusion for those reliant on physical cash. The digitisation of money can’t, in any way, leave those people behind.

"While we support the Bank of England's plan to continue working on the design of a potential retail digital pound, I would urge them to proceed with caution and maintain a genuinely open mind as to whether one is actually needed.”

Sponsored [Webinar] Unifying Card Programmes: The cost-reduction imperative

Related Company

Comments: (3)

Jeremy Light

Jeremy Light Co-founder at Fourdotzero

I published a LinkedIn article today with my cofounder at pingNpay arguing that CBDCs are more likely to follow a route of standardising private digital money such as fiat stablecoins that work in the market rather than centrally planned policy-driven initiatives seeing much success.

There are precedents for this such as the USA in the 19th century where competing forms of private money were standardised nationally as Federal Reserve notes in 1913. With different forms of USD stablecoins – USDT, USDC, TUSD, BUSD, PYUSD etc it is possible hitsory might repeat itself in the USA and in the UK too if private GBP stableocins take-off.

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7137192181659770880/

Dian Cecht

Dian Cecht Consultant at Caspa Consulting

Not an expert in history, but I believe that  prior to 1913 there was no central bank in the U.S, so the story is slightly different

Jeremy Light

Jeremy Light Co-founder at Fourdotzero

The Federal Reserve was formed in late 1913. Prior to that in the USA during the 19th century, first there were multiple forms of state bank notes, then multiple different national bank notes using a common design before Federal Reserve notes became the national standard in 1913.

My point is that there is precedent for multiple forms of private money to be standardised over time through legislation.

[Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the USFinextra Promoted[Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the US