/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

UK should tap open banking to take on card schemes - govt-commissioned review

The UK should use open banking to provide retailers with an alternative to card payments and to improve "clunky" P2P bank transfers, says a new government-commissioned review.

  6 7 comments

UK should tap open banking to take on card schemes - govt-commissioned review

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

Published alongside the chancellor's Autumn Statement, the independent review into the future of payments - led by Joe Garner, former CEO of Nationwide Building Society - calls for a national payments vision and strategy to simplify a well-developed but complex environment.

Among the specific recommendations is a push to tap into open banking to offer retailers an "alternative payment journey" to Visa and Mastercard.

Says the report: "While the benefits of cards are greatly appreciated, we heard a high degree of dissatisfaction from merchants regarding what they perceive as increases in scheme fees since interchange fees were forcibly reduced by the regulators".

In addition to calling for an alternative, the report urges the Payment Systems Regulator complete its work investigating these card scheme fees.

In a statement, Visa says: "We welcome competition and believe that putting customers first is critical – including tackling fraud, ensuring resilience, and delivering great payment experiences that power economic growth.”

Mastercard says: " We continuously invest in the latest and most innovative payment technologies, including open banking, playing our part in supporting the UK’s role as a global payments leader."

Garner also bemoans the "clunky" nature of P2P bank transfers, which requires users to enter account numbers and sort codes.

The UK recently closed a failed attempt to put a slicker consumer experience, called PayM. Rather than resuscitating this, open banking should be used to improve the experience, for instance by offering QR codes or unique URLs.

However, for open banking to take off for retail and P2P payments, the report says that consumer protections need to be improved with a minimum form of dispute resolution.

The government and Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee should also get an agreement of a commercial model for open banking "so that there is scope to invest in both infrastructure and consumer protection. Without sustainable financials, it is hard to see that open banking can thrive over the long term."

Meanwhile, there should be a review of whether some regulatory requirements are being applied appropriately to fintechs and an effort to reduce complexity for smaller firms. 

On protecting consumers, the review suggests the PSR conduct a review of the new APP fraud rules after 12 months and more ambitious government targets beyond 2024.

But, Strong Customer Authentication requirements could move away from detailed technical standards and for the FCA to supervise via an "outcomes-based approach".

Read the full review

Sponsored [On-Demand Webinar] Solving the KYC challenge with end-to-end processes

Comments: (7)

A Finextra member 

Good luck for those open banking entrepreneurs who attempt to build a MC/Visa killer application for retailer payments. The card schemes have had more than 60 years of experience built into their existing services and together with issuers and acquirers of cards the card payment service has been adapted to the differing needs of the multiple retailer and consumer segments. The requirements are much more extensive than getting rid of "cluncky entering of account numbers at a merchant till".  Security, control, convenience, consumer protection, cost efficience are issues that any alternative payment method must meet. For the consumer the debit card payment is in many ways better than making a real time account transfer to a store and the monies come from the same deposit account!

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

I must have said this more than a dozen times in the last dozen years but let me say it again: Consumers get rewards, deferred payment and other benefits if they pay with credit card. Why would they forego those benefits and switch to A2A OB payments where they get none of those benefits?

Unless the "what's in it for consumers" question is addressed, new A2A MOPs will likely meet the same fate as PingIt, PayByBank, PayM and all the other old A2A MOPs. 

While merchants have always whined about credit card processing fees, research has shown that consumers decide which MOP to pay with and merchants accept whichever MOP is chosen by consumers because, for merchants, every additional MOP leads to sales uplift, so cost of MOP is not as crucial as the revenue they'd lose by failing to make the sale if they declined the MOP chosen by the consumer.  

Hitesh Thakkar

Hitesh Thakkar Technology Evangelist (Financial Technology) at SME - Fintech startups (APAC and Africa)

Rome was not build in a day. QR based system supporting A2A can be good alternative for users. Oyster is still named as best cash less instrument for travellers -it evolved and undergone changes in regulation requirements. 

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

But ChatGPT *was* "built" - as in acquired 100M users - in 90 days.

Uber *did* launch taxi service in 600 cities in 3 years, including 100+ cities in India that never got taxis even in Roman Empire timescales. 

Digital products don't get timescales of analog products. The reason why digital business models get way more value than physical ones is that they can scale way faster than physical ones.

Nobody will give Rome-timescales for a digital payment category, especially one that has a track record of flopping repeatedly over the past 10 years. 

Steve Haley

Steve Haley Director of Market Development and Partnerships at Mojaloop Foundation

When a viable alternative is available for customers, merchants will rebel, and governments have a role to play in breaking monopolistic behavior.  And if the argument is "it must be impossible because I don't see how", there are plenty of spectator seats available.  

A Finextra member 

Good luck in the work to build an OB based "tap and go card payment killer" application with instant payments from current accounts in the middle of the expanding APP fraud tsunami which will make people much more careful with their current account usage. 

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

Well said @Finextra Member. We've already started seeing the impact of mounting APP Scams in UPI in India. Slowly, there's a push to use UPIlite wallet, which is going back in time to the PayTM Wallet in the 2010s and Stored Value Cards I had in Germany in 2000s. Or delink the primary checking account from UPI and link a secondary account with minimum balance "that you can afford to lose", which is again like PayTM / SVC.

[Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming MandatesFinextra Promoted[Webinar] 2025 Fraud Trends: Synthetic Identity, AI and Incoming Mandates