/payments

News and resources on payments systems, innovations and initiatives worldwide.

PayPal faces class-action suit claiming anticompetitive pricing rules

PayPal has been hit with a class-action lawsuit accusing the firm of anticompetitive "anti-steering" rules that leave consumers paying excess charges.

  3 Be the first to comment

PayPal faces class-action suit claiming anticompetitive pricing rules

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The suit, filed in California by consumers represented by law firm Hagens Berman, says that PayPal's anti-steering rules stifle competition against lower cost payment platforms like Stripe and Shopify.

The rules, written into user agreements that all merchants must sign to accept PayPal and Venmo payments, mean that retailers have to agree not to offer any discounts or inducements to persuade consumers to use other payment options that have a lower cost, say the attorney.

Merchants also cannot tell customers that other payment methods are more cost-effective or preferred, according to the complaint.

For example, says Hagens Berman, a merchant could charge $5.83 for a box of Kleenex when PayPal is used as the payment method, and less than $5.83 when the consumer paid with credit card or other payment. Or, a merchant could maintain the same $5.83 sticker price but provide consumers with a discount when they paid with a method other than PayPal or Venmo.

“Either way, the price differential would result in consumers paying lower all-in prices,” the lawsuit says.

Sponsored [On-Demand Webinar] Trusted Transactions: The Future of Risk-Based Authentication

Related Company

Keywords

Comments: (0)

[New Impact Study] Bank Legacy Transformation is Not a New Challenge: Exploring the SolutionsFinextra Promoted[New Impact Study] Bank Legacy Transformation is Not a New Challenge: Exploring the Solutions