USAA sues Wells Fargo over remote deposit capture patents

USAA has filed a federal lawsuit against Wells Fargo alleging patent infringement on its mobile remote deposit capture technology.

  2 4 comments

USAA sues Wells Fargo over remote deposit capture patents

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The lawsuit, filed in US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, is asking for unspecified damages from banking giant Wells Fargo.

Online military bank USAA holds around 50 patents connected to its technology that lets members deposit cheques by scanning them with mobile phones.

Last year, USAA began asking banks for licensing fees related to the patents. Wells has so far failed to license the technology, prompting the lawsuit, according to the San Antonio Express-News.

The complaint says "it is improper for Wells Fargo to use, without permission, patented technologies that USAA has spent immense resources to invent, develop, implement, and perfect".

In 2014 USAA settled a suit with mobile cheque imaging outfit Mitek Systems with no money changing hands.

Sponsored [Webinar] Money Mule Defence: Practical Applications and the Role of Technology

Related Company

Channels

Comments: (4)

Mark Sibthorpe

Mark Sibthorpe prez at msba

Seriously, patent tolls at work here.

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

50 patents for just Mobile RDC? Kudos to USAA for achieving that stunning feat!

Mark Sibthorpe

Mark Sibthorpe prez at msba

Ketharaman, I am assuming your comment is toungue and cheek. This is like big banks filing blockchain patents. Patent trolls pure and simple.

Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan Founder and CEO at GTM360 Marketing Solutions

@MarkSibthorpe: Not really. Patent is a patent is a patent. The fact that the patent office has granted it means the patent has merit. If it doesn't have merit, the patent office shouldn't grant the patent. Patent trolling relates to purpose of filing patent. Even if somebody files a patent only with the intent of trolling - and there's no evidence that USAA has done that in this instance - it doesn't take away the feat of getting the patent in the first place. 

New Event Report – Natural Capital FinanceFinextra PromotedNew Event Report – Natural Capital Finance