Payments competition body says banks should sell stakes in VocaLink

The UK's Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) says banks should sell their stakes in VocaLink to help increase innovation and competition in the nation's critical payments infrastructure.

  16 5 comments

Payments competition body says banks should sell stakes in VocaLink

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

The recommendations follow a review by the watchdog into the ownership and competitiveness of the Bacs, Faster Payments System and the Link network.

These payment systems are currently owned by a relatively small number of banks, which also control VocaLink, the single infrastructure provider that they rely on to process payments.

In the UK, VocaLink processes over 90% of salaries, more than 70% of household bills and almost all state benefits. Nearly every business and person in the UK uses its technology and last year the company processed over 11 billion transactions with a value of £6 trillion.

The PSR believes that the common ownership of VocaLink by a small number of banks is having a "negative impact on innovation and competition in the industry".

Hannah Nixon, PSR managing director, says: “ The evidence we have gathered shows that common ownership is hampering competition and the speed of innovation in the market. There needs to be a fundamental change in the industry to encourage new entrants to compete on service, price and innovation in an open and transparent way."

The PSR is also recommending the introduction of a new competitive and transparent procurement process for future payments networks to enable other vendors to enter the market.

"This will be an open, independently monitored process, based on best practice," states the report. "It will be used as soon as an operator’s current contract with VocaLink comes up for renewal."

The regulatory body is also recommending the introduction of a common messaging standard for communicating with the infrastructure provider in order to level the playing field and ease access for new entrants.

“Our proposals will increase competition and create more opportunities for challengers, fintechs and other organisations looking to enter the market.," says Nixon. "This will create the conditions for greater innovation - which is in the interests of those that use the infrastructure services directly, and the UK economy as a whole.”

The full report is open for consultation until 21 April.

"The PSR’s proposals will have a significant impact on the payments landscape, so we are encouraging feedback to ensure that the final market review delivers the changes that are needed in a balanced way," the body states.

Sponsored [Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the US

Related Company

Keywords

Comments: (5)

Jean-Pierre Xiao-Min Wang

Jean-Pierre Xiao-Min Wang Founder & Head of research at IndiceA

Payments competition, Banks & Fintechs :

" A horse never runs so fast as when he has other horses to catch up and outpace. " --- Ovid

 

Hitesh Thakkar

Hitesh Thakkar Technology Evangelist (Financial Technology) at SME - Fintech startups (APAC and Africa)

Looking at issues at Vocalink, I feel NPCI - Indian national level payment infrastrucure provider is better placed with fast payment including mobile (IMPS) as well as going ahead with Universal Hub based API recently.

Nick Ogden

Nick Ogden Chairman at Ogden Research

Selling shares in a monopoly provider does not create competition, but should reduce any "market disadvantage" controls. The report makes interesting reading but to create a true open market requires true competiton, and I am unclear how just opening access resolves this at a sustainable or practical level. 

Ramadas Mv

Ramadas Mv Managing Partner at Enterprise Banking Architects

This issue seems to be complex for the PSR as the Vocalink operate the central payment processing infrastructure for the UK economy. The regulatory body must look at new models/frameworks by bringing the independent demostic payment infrastructure and messaging standards.

A Finextra member 

Dear Nick - you are right, selling a monopoly tomomebody else does not create competition. Should owner banks decide to sell, the only taket likely to pay for the value would be a private equity investor. The new single owner would recoup its investment by increasing pricing and cutting cost. The outcome may be that the banks would have to pay more for the services and thus also the end user customers would pay more. Cost cutting  could mean that one pays more but gets a poorer service. The only thing achieved would then be that no bank has an advantage - instead everybody have a more exoensive and poorer service...

[Webinar] Reaping the benefits of Hyper-Personalisation with AI and Application ModernisationFinextra Promoted[Webinar] Reaping the benefits of Hyper-Personalisation with AI and Application Modernisation