Chaps lowers fees in bid to attract new members

The UK's high value payments system Chaps has slashed 50% off fees for low volume direct participants as it responds to public pressure for fairer access from new market entrants.

  5 1 comment

Chaps lowers fees in bid to attract new members

Editorial

This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.

Previously, the Chaps funding model was solely based on the volume of payments processed, with each direct participant making a 2% minimum contribution, resulting in a minimum cost of £80,000 per annum in 2014.

The new model now comprises a fixed annual shareholder charge of £30,000 - which is expected to proportionately decline as more participants join - and a system usage charge based on prior year volumes.

As of this year, a low-volume direct participant is likely to be charged an annual aggregate cost of approximately £40,000 - a 50% saving over last year.

Part of the brief of the UK's new Payment Systems Regulator is to provide improved access to payment systems, amid concerns that the current models are holding back competition and stifling innovation.

Phil Kenworthy, Chaps Co managing director says: “We are seeing a greater interest from payment service providers in directly joining Chaps, and we anticipate growth in our direct participation over the next two years as a result of this and other initiatives planned for 2015.”

In 2011, the Bank of England urged the Chaps board to expand direct access over fears about the financial stability of the platform. At the time, Chaps membership consisted of 18 direct participants, a figure which has risen to only 21 over the intervening period.

Sponsored [New Impact Study] Catering to a new generation through unified card programmes

Related Company

Comments: (1)

A Finextra member 

Does this change the Bank of England's policies related to CHAPS that are an equally significant blocker:

  1. reluctance to open Settlement Accounts for new members
  2. refusal to allow Settlement Accounts to go overdrawn against pledged collateral - instead the only option is to do repos
  3. permit banks subject to the PRA Reserves scheme to put their Reserves into their Settlement Account intraday and use them to make CHAPS payments, meaning the Reserves cases to be Reserves?

Do the IT/Disaster Recovery requirements of CHAPS alter? I would have thought that these would outweigh a reduction of £40,000 p.a. in fees.

[On-Demand Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the USFinextra Promoted[On-Demand Webinar] PREDICT 2025: The Future of AI in the US