Join the Community

22,714
Expert opinions
43,940
Total members
363
New members (last 30 days)
189
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,921
Total comments

Latest expert opinions

clear
clear
Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Pay.UK governance and ongoing indications of a fiasco

Having taken a break from following the governance of Pay.UK for a while, a quick skim underlines the prevailing chaos. We have already written about the ditching of a key feature of ISO20022 XML and the broken governance arrangements that have permitted this. There is a claim to openness about Pay.UK’s affairs, but this is belied by both the styl...

/payments

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Pay.UK Board ditches main benefit of ISO20022 adoption

Pay.UK was set up to deliver a New Payments Architecture (“NPA”) for the UK, implementing the blueprint that was passed to them by the Payment Strategy Forum. NPA would be based on the usage of the ISO20022 XML data format to enable rich data to flow up and down the payment chain between the two endpoints. This is the core value point of ISO20022. ...

/payments

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part VIII and the low standards for firms to meet

This is the eighth and final blog in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. This one concerns the “expectations” and “standards” that firms should abide by, if they are signatories to the code. Firms have to ...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part VII and customers’ added responsibilities

This is the seventh blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. It adds considerable work for the customer and in doing so reduces the numbers who will be able to make a successful claim. With...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part VI as customers’ baseline rights are overridden

This is the sixth blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. In it we discuss how customers’ baseline rights in law are overlooked. The CReM fails to adequately qualify what happens in an AP...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part V few customers covered, voluntary for firms, and dependent upon CoP

This is the fifth blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. Here we focus on who qualifies for cover, who is offering cover, and the vague contingency of cover on the as-yet non-existent Con...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part IV, and ensuring validation of mandatory data at the beneficiary firm

This is the fourth blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. We made the point in Part III that firms demanded Name + Sort Code + Account Number as mandatory information for instruct...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part III, cause of 'wrong name' APPF and customer’s current legal protection

This is the third blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. It doesn’t, not least because it fails to set out, as a baseline, what the customer’s rights are in law now under the 2017 Payment...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code Part II bizarre choice of types of fraud covered by it

This is the second blog out of eight in our series on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (“CReM”) that purports to offer customers (also known as Payment Service Users or “PSUs”) strong protection against certain types of Authorised Push Payment Fraud, or “APPF”. This one is on the types of fraud covered by the CReM. APPF comes in two main fl...

/payments Transaction Banking

Bob Lyddon

Bob Lyddon Consultant at Lyddon Consulting Services

Crummy CReM code offers no comfort to UK payment fraud victims Part 1

This is the first of 8 blogs on the Contingent Reimbursement Model code (or “CReM”) that has been finalised by an offshoot of the UK’s Payment Systems Regulator called the Authorised Push Payments Scams Steering Group. The PSR announced the unveiling of the final version of the CReM with the usual fanfare. This is the code, a year or more in the pr...

/payments /regulation Transaction Banking

Now Hiring