AFAIK, the fundamental purpose of Blockchain is to create a decentralized ledger that will not be forced into a "unified approach" by any centralized authority. And here comes Microsoft trying to do exactly that. In CoCo, I see a repeat of what has happened several times with many "open standards" initiatives over the decades. Going by the outcomes on those occasions, I'm very confident that CoCo will be a game-changer for enterprise adoption of Blockchain but only at the cost of being a "game-crusher" of the basic principle of the technology.
24 Aug 2017 13:17 Read comment
Kudos to BankAm. Hope this solution solves the pesky RECON problems I described in Enhanced Remittance Data Could Multiply Electronic Fund Transfer Volumes and takes EFT usage to new heights.
24 Aug 2017 12:59 Read comment
@StephanKotze:
Oh, yes, I remember you said IaaS before. For IaaS, the Google CSEK and AWS KMS extracts cited by you make it amply clear a PaaS provider can't even access Bank 1's data - let alone use Bank 1's data to provide insights to Bank 2.
24 Aug 2017 10:54 Read comment
I'm copying / pasting my comment from another Finextra post entitled The Cloud is ready for Banks but are Banks ready for the Cloud?:
If I understand this and this FORTUNE magazine articles correctly, Salesforce and Oracle are planning to do something like this. Nature of insights include:
24 Aug 2017 09:34 Read comment
@JonathanCharley:
TY for your reply.
24 Aug 2017 09:29 Read comment
Whenever a cloud provider says "security", it means keeping customer's data secure from unauthorized third parties. But what about keeping customer's data secure from first party i.e. itself? IOW, what if a cloud provider uses Bank A's data to provide insights to Bank B? How many banks are ready for this?
PS: I've posted a similar comment below Why migrating to the cloud offers more security than you might think
24 Aug 2017 08:43 Read comment
TY for your kind words.
Since you liked that, here's another one: Whenever a cloud provider says "security", it means keeping customer's data secure from unauthorized third parties. That's the popular notion of security. But what about keeping customer's data secure from first party i.e. itself? IOW, what stops a cloud provider from using Bank A's data to provide insights to Bank B? How many banks will accept this? This surely can't happen in onprem.
23 Aug 2017 18:49 Read comment
@BryanClagett:
I thought "banks want to be tech companies". By pushing towards cloud services, won't they push back to being banks?:)
23 Aug 2017 17:31 Read comment
@MelvinHaskins:
"outside of the USA" - what is there? You mean there are actually other countries outside the USA?? Jokes apart, I thought Citi is quite popular in UK / EU.
23 Aug 2017 17:10 Read comment
IMO, the challenge is slightly different. The principles (i.e. PaaS / SaaS product vendors) are the ones creating the excessive hype. If implementation partners - who are agents of the principles - try to inject a dose of reality into customers, they'd be ones risking rejection by customers drunk on the Kool-Aid supplied by the principles.
23 Aug 2017 15:02 Read comment
Tamas KadarFounder and CEO at SEON
Sunil JhambFounder and CEO at WLPayments
Olivier NovasqueFounder and CEO at Sidetrade
Walid HosniFounder and CEO at GXEGY
Eldad TamirFounder and CEO at FINQ
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.