Community

The most elementary level playfield principle means that we would have to pay for two payment systems instead of one. Dead on arrival..

How about being able to send invoices - just like payments. Easy and very small investment needs.

Never been a big believer in prepaid. How soon history alltogether?

So it is not only a question of the payment being ultra-convenient and safe but ALSO automatically taking care of accounting and reporting on  BOTH sides (consumers also need financial reporting) - and then moving it into real time. R E V O L U T I O N time..

Finland has been there already for a good while. But I would rather have seen panEU e-invoicing first - hundreds of billions better business case.

In other words - nobody can afford narrowminded self indulgance these days. We all need to see the big picture and work together to make the progress happen.

Any enterprise that can contribute significantly to saving tax payers money and furthering progress in the e-society - especially when it can be done without additional investments of any significance and a decent business case (if not huge income) - should do so these days. This is widely understood already. Is it necessary to say that this applies especially to banks - these days? 

When has clinging to the past been a good strategy?

How would there not be a business case for banks? And a huge business case for society at large! We should obviously look forward and change old habits - this is a typical case where clinging to the past is really harmful.

There will be a lot of warts if public-private partnership is not aligned. Like - huge spending of tax payer's money - and total flop as seldom used credentials will not be used. I call this stupidity. There should be enough warning examples already.