Its a sad state of affairs when HR feel that remote sackings are the right way to go about things. Such cowardly behaviour says it all about Human Remains today that was once a department that cared for employees
They deserve all they get for this embarrasing mess and hopefully a few HR heads are lopped off
24 Apr 2012 10:44 Read comment
This is a very major move and one that is fraught with danger for financial markets. As always the devil will be in the detail but it looks like costs in Financial markets are about to go up and by huge ammounts. The Post Trade Forum hosted by the London Stock Exchange will be debating the risks in CCPs and possible long term benefits. See Post Trade Forum on this site for booking details
29 Mar 2012 18:10 Read comment
Dust it off Kathleen! Its amazing how everything appears to change but nothing really. The time is here and now to make things happen
22 Mar 2012 21:59 Read comment
They could start also with clients like that lush Miss Piggy and that crazy Bear that is totally untrustworhy and that Gonzo chap who is just risk personified. Lookout for code names like the Kermit account or perhaps Big Bird you know the one that lays eggs
Come to think of it Goldman have their work cut out and maybe a humble apology and a resolve to their clients might be best. Hanging employees is not what will do the trick if its a ademic culture thing. Glad they are doing something anyway
22 Mar 2012 18:50 Read comment
There is no doubt a protective barrier to implmenting the changes that the market needs in clearing. I can not say how long this situation will last but i guess not for long. OTC in the frame could ignite the touch paper
I like the idea of an alternative to Clearing houses and see this as a quick and cost effective way of dealing with some of the problems at least. I am looking forward to giving these issues a good going over in the Post Trade Forum debate. It might be the only forum where a spade will be called a spade and the issues uncovered and decided upon
22 Mar 2012 18:41 Read comment
Remember SWIFT is a bank owned organisation and the Banks legally have to abide by sanctions. So SWIFT had no choice. Although i would prefer discussion rather than sanction i cant blame SWIFT for doing what they were told to do. The alternative is legal sanctions against SWIFT and possibly Banks
20 Mar 2012 11:41 Read comment
Yes very much so. SWIFT did not have a choice
16 Mar 2012 11:19 Read comment
Yes Kathleen the origins of local clearing made sense then but as we know the cross border investing has created multi national owners of the assets and those assets are now multi national. The introduction of OTC just complicates the default management and establishing beneficial ownership could be difficult and very time consuming
Part of the anser is for all CCPs to be under the same laws and jurisdictions but that looks unlikely in the short term
I will be interested in your views and the Post Trade Forum panel on this at the debate in April
16 Mar 2012 10:12 Read comment
Welcom back Kathleen and thanks for your comments. We would welcom you to join the Post Trade Forum Group on LinkedIn that is only open to participants and people from regulated FS firms. We will be writing a report on the debate within the restrictions of Chatham House rule for members of the Post Trade Forum and those attending the debate
15 Mar 2012 17:14 Read comment
Yup listen and think and innovate would be my mantra
15 Mar 2012 16:21 Read comment
XBRL Discussion Group
Post-Trade Forum
EBAday
Operational Risk Management
Peter FokasAnalyst at na
Dave KershawAnalyst at Ulster Bank
Annette CharlesAnalyst at Coast Capital
Ganesh HegdeAnalyst at SignDesk
Robert NewmanAnalyst at Future Markets Research Tank (FMRT)
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.