if the man (umm.. person!) was up for carrying a backpack with a card wired to it down his sleeve, or otherwise concealed on his person................a real gift for 'stop and search'
24 Feb 2010 19:17 Read comment
I agree that reliable fraud stats are hard to come by - since 2004 the European ATM Security Team (EAST) has been reporting at a European level on ATM related fraud and losses (including cross-border).
An extract from their press release on a report published in October 2009 and covering January to June 2009 states (when compared to the period July to December 2008): "....While card skimming incidents are down by 19% (from 5,693 to 4,629 incidents)........Losses due to card skimming are down by 30% (from €222 million to €156 million)........This indicates that the EMV rollout at ATMs in Europe (now 92% complete) is helping to reduce skimming losses, and also that fraud counter-measures, fraud monitoring capabilities and fraud detection are improving."
As over 95% of Europe's nearly 400,000 ATMs are now EMV compliant, the pattern of cross-border losses has shifted considerably over the past 3 years from primarily in Europe to primarily outside of Europe. A report covering the full year 2009 is likely to be published by EAST in late March/early April.
16 Feb 2010 09:21 Read comment
for a related debate see https://www.finextra.com/blogs/fullblog.aspx?blogid=3581
09 Dec 2009 11:05 Read comment
Thanks for the feedback Dave. Sounds like the Northern Bank Fivers are right at the end of their lifecycle - assuming they are the ones produced in 1999/2000. Polymer banknotes can have a lifecycle of up to 8 years, while the average lifecycle of a paper banknote is just 2 years.........................
09 Dec 2009 10:08 Read comment
Marite
I like the possible solution you mentioned:
"Another solution which a group of european banks admitted is the most efficient method to deflect the increase of cross-border fraud (as well as CNP fraud) is to enable the cardholder to activate or deactivate their card for out-of-country use and CNP use. This way, even if the cards get skimmed, the clone cards are rejected. Even if a carder gets the correct card number with cvv/exp date, the fraudster will not be able to use the card details in a CNP transaction."
Does anyone know if there is a suggested practical or favoured approach to this? How would the cardholder do this? By telephone, by SMS, by Internet? Has anything been tested?
27 Nov 2009 15:31 Read comment
Information Security
Brittany GarlandExecutive Director at IHS Markit
Fethi AkkariExecutive director at Central Bank of Tunisia
Alpesh TailorExecutive Director at GFT
Kelly FryerExecutive Director at Fintech Sandbox
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.