Community

I don’t think this is about charge back I think it’s about legislation where the credit card issuer is liable for the supplier delivering to the consumer.

In other words the consumer is not protected. Might it be better to balance the providers benefits with the consumers in articles like this? Bringing down the cost per tx is cold comfort to a consumer if they lose protection without realising it and the tx is for hundreds/thousands eg a holiday or airline ticket.

Does this mean the consumer loses the protection of making a payment via credit card and having recourse to the card issuer?

Ha!  His boss, the Governor of the Bank of England, said the six most expensive words in the English language are 'this time it will be different' ...

Don't confuse trusting some people with trusting everyone ... anonymous knowledge is fine until it isn't anonymous ...

You can't assume that because you have moved on from 'big brother' fears the population at large has. Well actually of course you can assume that, good luck with your assumption.

Oh dear, do you work for the chip company? I know about the cameras, I live in UK with more CCTV per head than anywhere else but I could opt to live in a country without cameras, or up a Welsh mountain. I'm not stepping over a line where someone plonks a chip inside me me, if you want to go ahead, be my guest.

Anon does have a smart phone which he can switch off and leave at home.

Great. Tracked 24x7. Who would be nuts enough to have any sort of teachable implant.