Join the Community

21,630
Expert opinions
43,844
Total members
422
New members (last 30 days)
159
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,577
Total comments

Steal from the rich ..and the rest of Europe too

1 comment

Regulations being proposed and imposed on the financial world are coming thick and fast. Not content with the sheer weight of regulation looming in the OTC derivatives markets, European regulators are now contemplating what appears to be a serious proposal to introduce a transaction tax on bond, share, and derivative transactions. Otherwise known as the ‘Tobin’ or ‘Robin Hood’ tax, banks will be charged 0.01 – 0.1% per transaction in a ‘give back to the economy’ taxation mission spearheaded by the European Commission.

First point is that some seem to think this is an attack specifically on high frequency trading (HFT) or offensively wealthy maverick undue-risk-taking bankers. It is not. A tax measured in basis points on the trade, without any additional per-ticket charge, affects all types of financial institutions subject to it in equal proportion. The upshot is that every organisation subject to the tax will need to consider their business case to move to a lower taxed jurisdiction, and/or to change their trading strategy so the tax is less material to each trade’s success. 

These forced changes to trading strategies should concern us the most. Firms will withdraw from the market when the tax means their strategy is no longer viable, and remaining participants will likely reduce volumes traded given the tax is volume sensitive. With less active participants and opportunities, market making will become more difficult. Trading venues will close. Affected markets will become increasingly less liquid, reducing the tax take, and creating knock-on impact way beyond financial institutions. The Commission should consider whether it is acceptable that corporate and industrial firms will find it increasingly challenging to locally fund their Eurozone investment projects through primary market activity in these less liquid markets.

It is ironic and astounding that on one hand we have a clear call from regulators to align legislation in order to prevent regulatory arbitrage as a result of OTC clearing reform, while on the other hand we have a genuine proposal for a unilaterally implemented and fundamental change to market operation which distances Eurozone markets from other continents.  

While there is a political will to bash bankers and an obvious need to reassure the taxpayer that banks are playing their part in the economic recovery, this recent proposal is a short-sighted, headline-grabbing initiative which will result in Europe being a less competitive market place across all industries – not just banking.  If the intent is to tax particular financial institutions, surely the most transparent way to do this would be to introduce a financial institutions tax tailored to size and type of institution, rather than interfering directly with market operation and triggering far more damaging consequences.

 

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

21,630
Expert opinions
43,844
Total members
422
New members (last 30 days)
159
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,577
Total comments

Trending

Nkiru Uwaje

Nkiru Uwaje Chief Operating Officer at Mansa

Explained: The Tokenisation of Financing

Dirk Labuschagne

Dirk Labuschagne Chief Information Security Officer at Direct Transact

Financial Shutdown Risk Mitigation

Now Hiring