Join the Community

24,213
Expert opinions
40,775
Total members
355
New members (last 30 days)
216
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,305
Total comments

Finding your fintech development partner: A practical guide

The wrong technical partner can derail your fintech project before it launches. Here's how to choose one that actually delivers.

Precision matters in fintech. So does security. And speed. Miss any of these, and you're looking at delays, blown budgets, or worse - regulatory headaches that could shut you down.

I've watched too many fintech founders make the same mistakes when selecting development partners. They chase low quotes, skip the hard questions, or mistake slick presentations for actual capability. Then they're stuck rebuilding six months in.

This isn't about finding coders. It's about finding a team that gets what you're building and why it matters.

What Actually Matters in Vendor Proposals

Vague proposals signal trouble. If a vendor can't articulate exactly what they're building and when, they either don't understand your requirements or they're planning to figure it out on your dime.

Strong proposals break work into distinct phases: discovery, development, deployment. Each phase includes specific deliverables and realistic timelines. But here's what separates good vendors from mediocre ones - the questions they ask upfront.

Do they probe how your system handles transaction spikes? Ask about existing platform integrations? Flag potential compliance issues before you even mention them? That's a vendor thinking beyond the immediate build.

Review proposals with these criteria:

  • Specific functionalities tied to clear milestones

  • Identified risks with proposed mitigation strategies

  • Detailed resource allocation showing who does what

  • Explicit assumptions that prevent scope creep later

A fintech startup I know went with the cheapest bid. The proposal looked fine until they realised testing wasn't included. Post-launch fixes cost three times the initial savings. Sometimes the expensive proposal is actually the bargain.

When a quote seems unusually low, ask why. The answer tells you everything.

The Real Cost Equation

Hourly rates lie. What matters is the value of the result obtained for every euro spent.

A developer charging €50/hour who ships a secure, scalable app in 200 hours beats a €30/hour team that takes 400 hours and delivers buggy code. You're not just paying for time - you're paying for expertise that prevents expensive mistakes.

Here's how the maths actually works:

Approach

Rate

Hours

Total

Reality Check

Budget team

€30

400

€12,000

Includes delays, bugs, rework cycles

Experienced team

€50

200

€10,000

Fewer issues, faster delivery, cleaner code

Before accepting any quote, understand what's included. Does that low bid cover security audits? DevOps setup? Proper testing environments? Or will those appear as "additional scope" later?

The vendors worth working with price for quality, not just hours logged.

Security Isn't Optional

One breach destroys trust that took years to build. Regulators know this, which is why they enforce standards like PCI DSS, ISO 27001, and GDPR with serious consequences.

Your development partner needs to embed security from day one, not bolt it on before launch. Ask how they approach secure coding. Do they follow OWASP guidelines? Run regular penetration tests? Treat encryption and authentication as baseline requirements?

A vendor who proactively raises security concerns during scoping calls is showing you their priorities. One team I worked with built GDPR-compliant data deletion features into a European client's platform from the start. When audit time came, they sailed through.

Essential security questions:

  • How do you protect sensitive payment data?

  • What's your experience with PCI DSS or GDPR compliance?

  • Are code reviews and vulnerability scans part of your standard process?

If a vendor can't answer these clearly, keep looking. Your reputation depends on their security expertise.

Transparency Builds Trust

Projects hit problems. Code has bugs. Integrations break. This is normal. What's not normal - and not acceptable - is hiding these issues until they become crises.

The best vendor relationships run on radical transparency. You should never wonder what's happening with your project or discover problems weeks after they started.

Look for partners who work in your repositories and project management tools. Real-time visibility catches issues early. One trading platform caught an integration problem during a routine check-in that would have cost weeks if discovered later.

Transparency checklist:

  • Direct access to code repositories and CI/CD dashboards

  • Scheduled sprint reviews or weekly demos

  • Honest reporting of both progress and challenges

  • Communication style that matches your team's workflow

Time zones matter too. If your vendor's working hours never overlap with yours, expect communication delays that slow everything down.

Building for the Long Term

Your first release isn't the finish line. It's the starting point for growth, iteration, and scale.

Smart fintech companies balance in-house innovation with strategic outsourcing. Keep your core IP - proprietary algorithms, unique business logic - internal. Partner externally for specialised work like complex integrations or frontend development.

DevOps practices separate amateur vendors from professionals. Automated CI/CD pipelines, proper environment separation (development, staging, production), and systematic testing prevent the manual deployment disasters that plague rushed projects. One team cut their client's release cycle by 40% just by implementing proper automation.

Due diligence that matters:

  • Talk to clients who've used their software for 6+ months

  • Ask about system scalability and long-term maintainability

  • Understand how they handle post-launch issues

  • Verify team consistency throughout projects

Portfolio analysis reveals capability. Look for fintech projects with complex security requirements or challenging integrations. Generic case studies with thin details deserve scepticism.

Plan for knowledge transfer from the start. Your vendor should be training your team for eventual ownership, not creating permanent dependency. Joint sprint work builds internal expertise while maintaining momentum.

Making the Choice

Choosing a development partner shapes your fintech product's trajectory. The right team accelerates your vision. The wrong one becomes an expensive lesson in what not to do.

Focus on vendors who ask hard questions, price for value, embed security by default, and communicate transparently. Check their fintech track record thoroughly. Ensure their working style aligns with yours.

The best partnerships feel like an extension of your team, not an external vendor relationship. That's when real innovation happens.

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

24,213
Expert opinions
40,775
Total members
355
New members (last 30 days)
216
New opinions (last 30 days)
29,305
Total comments

Now Hiring