Community
As is so often the case with some of the lengthy documents that make up the Shakespearean drama that is the MiFID II implementation, the devil is in the detail. The technical standards on position limits for commodity derivatives are a good example. Right at the very end, just before President Juncker's imprimatur, is a little tidbit suggesting that competent authorities will adjust any position limit as they see fit in times of excessive volatility in the price of a derivative or its underlying commodity (Article 21).
So for the purposes of this particular bit of rulemaking, who gets to define what constitutes excessive volatility? Are we looking at a flash crash-type intraday move? A 10-15% spike in the price of the underlying? And what about the reactive impact of breaking news of a conflict or threatened drought? Will we end up with a regulator-driven price limit regime that stands wholly separate from those that the exchanges have imposed on a product by product basis for years?
I guess time will tell, but I’ll be keeping an eye on the fine print to see how this one pans out.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Nkahiseng Ralepeli VP of Product: Digital Assets at Absa Bank, CIB.
10 March
Nicholas Holt Head of Solutions and Delivery, Europe at Marqeta
07 March
Ivan Nevzorov Head of Fintech Department at SBSB FinTech Lawyers
Brian Mahlangu VP Product: Digital Platforms Mobile at Absa Bank, CIB.
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.