Community
Not so fast...
" Including and distinguishing prior art in the patent application, which will be noted in a patent if and when a patent ultimately issues, entitles the patent holder to this tremendous presumptive advantage, by law. "
I took a look at Bank of America's patent - 7,319,986 issued Jan. 15, 2008. In BofA's patent, there was no mention of a prior art which was already issued a patent status in August of 2005 by USPTO, patent no. 6,931,382.
Bank of America's patent 7,319,986, claims no. 9 and 23 which provide the actual management/security/control of a card account (payment instrument) by allowing a cardholder to set limits which will then be 'tested' prior to authorizing a card transaction has already been cited as a claim in a patented prior art - No. 6,931,382, claim no. 7.
Signed:
Inventor of Prior Art (Patent No. 6,931,382)
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Andrew Ducker Payments Consulting at Icon Solutions
19 December
Jamel Derdour CMO at Transact365 / Nucleus365
17 December
Andrii Shevchuk CTO & Co-Partner at Concryt
16 December
Alex Kreger Founder & CEO at UXDA
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.