A majority of respondents indicated they plan to automate post-trade OTC derivatives processes, with nearly 70% answering that they will do so in 2010. This automation includes affirmation, confirmation or collateral management.

"As OTC derivatives markets grow rapidly, it is clear that organizations are transforming their settlement operations through automation, and that organizations are at different states in this process. These initiatives become change management exercises via solutions which ultimately lead to better workflow efficiencies and controls. We conducted this survey in part to better understand how to translate the market's challenges into solutions which enable them to innovate and succeed in this rapidly changing landscape," said Ken Knowles, EVP, Financial and Risk Solutions, OpenLink.

The survey also revealed that respondents varied widely in their utilization of electronic OTC affirm/confirm processing. Approximately one third (28%) stated that most (more than 75%) of their affirmation, confirmation or collateral management processing is conducted electronically. About one quarter stated that electronic processing comprised 50-75% of that activity, (23%) conducted these activities electronically 25-49% of the time with the remainder of respondents at under 25%.

The survey was conducted at an OpenLink sponsored webinar entitled: Perspectives on OTC Trade Processing: Mitigating Risk through Operational Workflow Efficiencies. Participants included professionals who are looking to understand the impact of increasing volumes and upcoming regulation which will have a bearing on the future of trade processing.

When asked what areas of OTC they are most interested in learning about, the top three results were as follows:

-- 31% want to learn about operational efficiency
-- 21% are interested in risk management
-- 17% are interested in counterparty risk management



Finally, participants were asked to rank the level of counterpof counterparty review across asset classes achieved by their organizations as "High", "Medium" or "Low". While a little more than half selected the level at their firm's as "Medium," a little over a third noted that they have observed a high level of review. Only 11% stated that the level of review was" Low".

"The need for transparency underlies all of these statistics," said Fritz McCormick, Senior Analyst with Aite Group. "Gaps remain in affirmation/confirmation processes and counterparty review. Automating these areas, among others, will boost transparency, crucial for risk management, regulatory mandates and operational efficiency."

A new report from Aite Group focusing on Multi-Asset Portfolio Systems elaborates on this need for transparency. The report suggests that, in the context of steady growth in the OTC derivatives market, demand is strong for portfolio and accounting solutions to support these instruments.