Blog article
See all stories »

Branches: are they losing relevance or just numbers?

There was a time when ensuring prompt service to customers walking into the branch was the only measure of good customer service in retail banking. Of course revenue and profitability were important, but it was widely believed that if a bank branch wasn’t crowded, it just wasn’t doing good business.

That changed with the advent of digital channels and this began to overhaul the very fundamentals of the banking industry.

As banks realised that new channels provided a low cost alternative, channel migration became the name of the game. The target was not just to enroll customers for different channels but also to ensure that they actually used them. And then, if a bank branch was crowded, it just wasn’t doing smart business. Reduced footfall put a question mark on the sustainability of branches. (Check out: From 17,000 to 7,000: the decline of Britain's branch network and US branch networks set for steep decline – Celent).

So, can we conclude that branches have lost their prominence and a reduction of branch networks is the best option for banks looking for increased profitability?

The 2013 Financial Services Consumer Insight Survey by Datamonitor found that 61% of UK consumers chose their bank based on how onveniently its branch was located. Some banks are still opening new branches – TSB Bank, which markets itself as the ‘local bank for Britain’ is planning to open 30 new branches shortly. Branches also remain TSB’s most used service channel with 72% of customers who use any channel using a branch in the past three months and, 36% solely using branches to access their accounts. (Check out: TSB Bank still sees value in branches ). Additionally according to the Accenture report, Winning the race for relevance with banking customers”, more than half of bank customers use a branch every month despite the digital options available to them, while 21% use a branch at least once a week.

This gap will undoubtedly shrink as digital banking adoption increases and banks are able to promote their products and services better through digital devices: smartphones, smartwatches etc. But until then, consumers will still visit the bank branch – and that visit must be a smooth, helpful experience. So how can banks ensure their branches continue as valuable and relevant channels, working alongside and complementing other channels?

Branches for customer acquisition: Banks still consider branches as a pre-eminent channel for the acquisition of new customers. As a result, they want to be ‘nearer’ to their target customers. As per the Bancography which examined the state of branch banking in the United States, while average branch transaction volumes declined by 25% during the past five years, more than 95% of new accounts were still opened in the traditional branch channel. (Check out: http://www.bancography.com/downloads/BranchBriefing.pdf).

The dilemma is that the convenient branch locations are important when customers choose a bank. Yet after opening an account they will rarely visit the branch, and instead prefer transacting through digital channels.

The branch showroom: Some banks are looking for that "wow" factor to keep their branches relevant. They are turning branches into innovation showrooms: 

Human touch:  There are several reasons behind the enduring popularity of branch banking, not the least of which is a need for personal interaction. Branches still have wider service capabilities than digital channels, and the availability of financial advisors draws in customers looking to complete a high value or otherwise complex transaction. Customers even today identify with their banks through their branches and the people working inside them.

PwC in its article “Retail Banking 2020 Evolution or Revolution?” brought up a very interesting analysis. It cited that 60% of great experiences are due to great staff. 25% percent of customers rely on staff to do research, 46% to select products and 63% to resolve their problems. Hence though the future of banking is through click, swipe and touch, it will always have a place for the ‘human touch’.

So while banks invest in setting up next generation digital channels, there is no getting away from the value of branches.

Though the number of branches may be curtailed in future, they are not going to
vanish.

Success in future will belong to banks that are able to achieve the right blend of branch and digital. Banks should aim to be omni-channel service providers with branches playing a pivotal – albeit new – role.

When customers visit branches now, they look for quality interactions, service consistency and prompt problem resolution. Future branches hence will have to be far more efficiently run. Banks should equip themselves with solutions that streamline customer service: easy customer identification, a holistic customer view, queue management and prompt transaction processing. They should showcase their innovation in the branch: demonstrate the simplicity of digital banking, and sign up customers there and then.

While one cannot be sure of what’s in store for banking during the next decade, but for the time being branches matter. 

4342

Comments: (9)

James Piggot
James Piggot - Finastra - London 15 October, 2014, 08:41Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Thanks for an interesting post Shital. I wonder how long customer acquisition and sales will be continue through branches, you can open accounts online, and most banks will open loan and deposit accounts online, even mortgage/home loan accounts. But even online there has to be the human touch as you say to reply to queries and provide expert help.

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 15 October, 2014, 09:36Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Indeed - very interesting. It seems to me there will always be a need for branches at some level until all economies are cashless. For example - I didn't visit my branch to get foreign currency, I simply used an ATM at my destination. However, I do need to exchange my left over currency, and my local branch generally offers me the best rate to do that.

Similarly there will be people who prefer face to face discussions for certain financial transactions, particularly where they are not familiar with the products and are making substantial commitments. A person's first mortgage or loan, for example. Refinancing these once the customer is familiar with how they work may well be something they would do on line, but the initial set up is likely to be face to face for some time to come, at least in my opinion.

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 15 October, 2014, 10:09Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Ecommerce began over 20 years. For all its advantages, why has it managed to achieve only 7% of total retail sales so far? Why haven't brick-and-mortar stores vanished yet?

During the last 5 years, # of brick-and-mortar stores went up from 1680 to 2000 at at T J Maxx, went down from 75 to 55 at Saks, and Amazon is testing its first physical store (Source:

http://fortune.com/2014/09/03/where-have-all-the-shoppers-gone/).

All this tells me that the channel mix is more company-specific and less secular than often claimed.

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 15 October, 2014, 17:51Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Though I agree that the way forward would be a secure online process, be it for opening deposit accounts, applying for loans, cards, insurance, wealth management etc. but still there is a long way to go with many banks. Banks are increasingly focusing on driving sales through the online channel and are offering online application for many of its products but in most of the cases are merely lead generation tools. Like for loans, though you can apply online, still for varied KYC rules, documentation and internal processes, still visit to branch or interaction with branch staff remains.
This actually mars the overall online sales process which actually should be
more straightforward.

James Piggot
James Piggot - Finastra - London 15 October, 2014, 17:59Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

There are banks here in the UK where the Loan Origination process is completely online, at least for existing customers (no KYC required) who have a good credit rating.

Apply online and they will disburse the loan amount to your account within a few minutes. This does vary country to country and region to region but it shows what can be achieved within a given regulatory and technical mix.

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 16 October, 2014, 09:20Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

@ShitalC:

Like you, I've long believed that online sale of banking products was merely leadgen. 

Until yesterday. (a) According to an email I received from Kotak Mahindra Bank yesterday, funding of account is possible at the end of 10-minute online session. This was not the case when the same bank had introduced its Instant Account Opening portal 2 years ago. (b) Per this article in the Economic Times today (http://m.economictimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/citibank-and-sbi-experimenting-human-less-digital-banking-experience-at-the-mall/articleshow/44831896.cms), Citibank's digital bank in a mall in Mumbai allows online account opening on a kiosk all the way through to issuing a debit card in a single session (which the customer used to buy a product at the same mall that offered 20% cashback only on Citi cards) (c) According to the same article, SBI's digital bank at another Mumbai mall allows a customer to open a zero-balance account in 15 minutes, with KYC being done online via scanning of KYC documents and identity authenticated via Aadhaar Card database.

I haven't personally tried any of these offerings. But, if I take the messages at face value, these new developments take BFSI online capabilities to the next level. 

Namely to the level supported by ecommerce companies for almost 20 years. Ergo, my previous comment stands.

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 16 October, 2014, 09:25Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

@JamesP:

It's good to know that some banks in UK offer instant online application and near realtime loan disbursement. But the ability to offer it only to existing customers who have a good credit rating means they're applicable to a small segment of the addressable market for loans. At that level of penetration, the online channel is a long way off from replacing branches.

To me, the online channel can be said to have "truly arrived" only when it addresses the entire - or at least a majority - of the addressable market, after overcoming online KYC, realtime Credit Checks and other traditional bugbears of online sale of BFSI products. Do you know examples of any bank-owned loan origination systems in the UK or elsewhere that disburse loans in a few minutes to NEW customers whose credit score is UNKNOWN to the bank - similar to nonbank P2P portals like Zopa?

James Piggot
James Piggot - Finastra - London 16 October, 2014, 12:05Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

@s.ketharaman -

I don't think it is the credit rating that is the issue for non-customers as banks will use credit reference agencies to check the rating before they make an offer. But that is true in India as well, pretty sure CIBIL provides an online web service for banks to run credit checks.

A lot of banks will only lend to existing customers, Barclays and HSBC will only lend if you have an existing account with them, i.e. credit card, mortgage, savings.  Lloyds Bank will only lend to customers who have held a current account for over three months. They will disburse the funds straight away if the application is approved.

I think the issue is more about identity and fraud prevention, banks will give an instant online decision to non-customers but will only disburse the funds to an account with another bank once signed paperwork has been received.

For non-customers they have managed to address realtime credit checks, the KYC issue requires a signature on the printed out loan forms that are sent by post. No visit to a branch is required.

 

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 16 October, 2014, 13:52Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

@JamesP:

At the point of applying for a loan, a prospect need not have an account with the bank. In virtually all cases I know about, at the point of disbursal, they need to. While it's specific to company / country / culture, I know many banks whose loan tail wags the current account dog or, to put it in marketingspeak, the loan salesperson "cross-sells" the current account product.  So, when I’m referring to realtime disbursal, I’m talking about doing so within the same bank.

Banks advertise their products. Someone sees an ad and applies for a product. S/he is a rank stranger to the bank. The bank hasn't done any prior credit check on that person. Even when it comes to targeted offers made to specific people, I've observed on more than one occasion in India, Germany and UK that the bank hasn't done any prior credit check before making the offer. While this is not a good thing, it’s not a rare practice. So online credit check does become a necessary step in the online purchase process.  That combined with identity, fraud, KYC and other challenges highlighted by you preclude 100% closure on the online channel for the bulk of the addressable market. They compel wet ink signature, post, etc. To me any brick-and-mortar activity like these appear closer to “branch” than “online” even if there’s no need to visit a physical premise.

Which is precisely why the online channel is still not capable enough to replace branches for new product sales (not to mention problem resolution but that’s a story for another day!)

Now hiring